<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angel Review &#8211; &#8220;Unleashed&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583/angel-review-unleashed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583/angel-review-unleashed</link>
	<description>Bureau 42</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LC</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583/angel-review-unleashed/comment-page-1#comment-6595</link>
		<dc:creator>LC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583#comment-6595</guid>
		<description>Re: Oddness from Spike?
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;

Heh, homos with out pity is all about hating. If they could coordinate the hate they could move a small moon *G*
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Hi. 

I don&#039;t know if you realize it, but by saying &quot;homos&quot; in this derogatory tone, you&#039;ve essentially spit hate at people who might be the good friends, family, or even users of this board. In my case, it&#039;s some of the best friends I could hope to have. People who don&#039;t deserve terms like that.
&lt;p&gt;
I don&#039;t want this to end up devoted to the topic of homosexuality, since this isn&#039;t what the board is for, but I had to respond publically to a comment made in public. I&#039;m not going to respond to any more posts on the subject but if anybody wants to continue further, you can email me.
&lt;p&gt;
Respectfully,
&lt;p&gt;
LC </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Oddness from Spike?</p>
<blockquote TYPE="cite">
<p>Heh, homos with out pity is all about hating. If they could coordinate the hate they could move a small moon *G*
</p></blockquote>
<p>Hi. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if you realize it, but by saying &#8220;homos&#8221; in this derogatory tone, you&#8217;ve essentially spit hate at people who might be the good friends, family, or even users of this board. In my case, it&#8217;s some of the best friends I could hope to have. People who don&#8217;t deserve terms like that.</p>
<p>
I don&#8217;t want this to end up devoted to the topic of homosexuality, since this isn&#8217;t what the board is for, but I had to respond publically to a comment made in public. I&#8217;m not going to respond to any more posts on the subject but if anybody wants to continue further, you can email me.
</p>
<p>
Respectfully,
</p>
<p>
LC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: y42</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583/angel-review-unleashed/comment-page-1#comment-6545</link>
		<dc:creator>y42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2003 18:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583#comment-6545</guid>
		<description>Re: Excusing the Werewolf Rehash
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;Wes doesn&#039;t count?&lt;br&gt;
How &#039;bout Wes, Fred &lt;b&gt;and&lt;/b&gt; Lorne? Wes does the occasional spell, 
Fred 
does the dimensional rip thing, Lorne reads souls...
&lt;p&gt;
Why don&#039;t they count again?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
They don&#039;t count because they&#039;re not going to walk into a random room 
and throw knives with their mind, teleport people a mile into the air, flay 
the skin from someone&#039;s body with a gesture, etc.  There&#039;s a pretty clear 
Buffyverse line between people who read words from a book (Wesley/
Fred) or have one specialized magical ability (Lorne) and folks who have 
the ability to do just about anything they want with the magic inherent 
to them.
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
Well, so long as it keeps them away from the horrible &quot;magic as heroin&quot; 
metaphor, I&#039;m happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Excusing the Werewolf Rehash</p>
<blockquote TYPE="cite">
<blockquote TYPE="cite"><p>Wes doesn&#8217;t count?<br />
How &#8217;bout Wes, Fred <b>and</b> Lorne? Wes does the occasional spell,<br />
Fred<br />
does the dimensional rip thing, Lorne reads souls&#8230;</p>
<p>
Why don&#8217;t they count again?
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
They don&#8217;t count because they&#8217;re not going to walk into a random room<br />
and throw knives with their mind, teleport people a mile into the air, flay<br />
the skin from someone&#8217;s body with a gesture, etc.  There&#8217;s a pretty clear<br />
Buffyverse line between people who read words from a book (Wesley/<br />
Fred) or have one specialized magical ability (Lorne) and folks who have<br />
the ability to do just about anything they want with the magic inherent<br />
to them.
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, so long as it keeps them away from the horrible &#8220;magic as heroin&#8221;<br />
metaphor, I&#8217;m happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babbster</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583/angel-review-unleashed/comment-page-1#comment-6544</link>
		<dc:creator>Babbster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2003 17:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583#comment-6544</guid>
		<description>Re: Oddness from Spike?
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;I did quite go off Spike when the whole in-love-with-Buffy phase started, mostly because it seemed to be a commercial decision rather than a real characterization one, and it tried to make him far too sympathetic too soon.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
While I can understand the indictment of it as a commercial decision, I thought they handled it pretty well.  I found it interesting that despite the fact that there might have been &quot;true love&quot; going on, he managed to seek the most base representations of love (at least in season 6) - namely, sex and Buffy letting him get away with whatever he wanted to do - culminating in the attempted rape.  In other words, despite love he was still soulless and evil.  His actions after Buffy&#039;s resurrection and before obtaining his soul were aimed entirely at getting what he believed were his just rewards for being a &quot;good&quot; guy in the fight with Glory, and I thought that was interesting and compelling, especially since I could always find myself wondering how bad things would suddenly turn if his chip malfunctioned.
&lt;P&gt;
Maybe I&#039;m looking too hard for things to like about the 6th season, but I did think that Spike was the most interesting thing going on at the time. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Oddness from Spike?</p>
<blockquote TYPE="cite"><p>I did quite go off Spike when the whole in-love-with-Buffy phase started, mostly because it seemed to be a commercial decision rather than a real characterization one, and it tried to make him far too sympathetic too soon.</p></blockquote>
<p>
While I can understand the indictment of it as a commercial decision, I thought they handled it pretty well.  I found it interesting that despite the fact that there might have been &#8220;true love&#8221; going on, he managed to seek the most base representations of love (at least in season 6) &#8211; namely, sex and Buffy letting him get away with whatever he wanted to do &#8211; culminating in the attempted rape.  In other words, despite love he was still soulless and evil.  His actions after Buffy&#8217;s resurrection and before obtaining his soul were aimed entirely at getting what he believed were his just rewards for being a &#8220;good&#8221; guy in the fight with Glory, and I thought that was interesting and compelling, especially since I could always find myself wondering how bad things would suddenly turn if his chip malfunctioned.
</p>
<p>
Maybe I&#8217;m looking too hard for things to like about the 6th season, but I did think that Spike was the most interesting thing going on at the time. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LC</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583/angel-review-unleashed/comment-page-1#comment-6542</link>
		<dc:creator>LC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2003 11:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583#comment-6542</guid>
		<description>Re: Oddness from Spike?
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;
I&#039;m a Spike fan myself.  I never understood the hatred for him, except for possibly anti-BTVS-post-high-school backlash.  On the Internet, it could also be male backlash against the fact that a LOT of the ladies really seem to dig the Marsters.

Spike&#039;s faded appearance in Fred&#039;s office, though, would be classic manipulative Spike and I think was quite intentional.  
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
Yeah, I had to stop reading TWoP because of Strega and her gang of caustic avengers/people-who-hate.&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
My problem with &#039;classic manipulative Spike&#039; is that really hasn&#039;t been a side of Spike we&#039;ve seen since the soul (iirc). 
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Maybe I&#039;m being way too interpretive, but manipulative Spike could still easily work with a soul. Pre-vamp, he was very child-like, hurt easily and showing it easily, so delighted to read his poems to his mother and glowing when she said something nice, and so on, and so with the soul back, he might regress to a very child-like state which includes manipulation, &quot;It&#039;s not fair,&quot; obvious lies, whining, and of course being a brat any time Angel (Dad) is around. 
&lt;P&gt;
I did quite go off Spike when the whole in-love-with-Buffy phase started, mostly because it seemed to be a commercial decision rather than a real characterization one, and it tried to make him far too sympathetic too soon. If AtS can take this and reframe it to make him frequently obnoxious to the rest of the cast but entertaining and interesting to the audience, I think that&#039;d be a great tack.
&lt;P&gt;
I was wondering if I was the only one to give up the TwoP recaps--increasingly, it seems to me as though the recappers (not just for Buffy and Angel) are constantly jumping up and down shouting, &quot;Lookkit ME! Lookkit MEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!&quot; and riding their own hobbyhorses to exhaustion, instead of some of the genuinely funny and insightful writing that had been there. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Oddness from Spike?</p>
<blockquote TYPE="cite">
<blockquote TYPE="cite"><p>
I&#8217;m a Spike fan myself.  I never understood the hatred for him, except for possibly anti-BTVS-post-high-school backlash.  On the Internet, it could also be male backlash against the fact that a LOT of the ladies really seem to dig the Marsters.</p>
<p>Spike&#8217;s faded appearance in Fred&#8217;s office, though, would be classic manipulative Spike and I think was quite intentional.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, I had to stop reading TWoP because of Strega and her gang of caustic avengers/people-who-hate.</p>
<p>My problem with &#8216;classic manipulative Spike&#8217; is that really hasn&#8217;t been a side of Spike we&#8217;ve seen since the soul (iirc).
</p></blockquote>
<p>
Maybe I&#8217;m being way too interpretive, but manipulative Spike could still easily work with a soul. Pre-vamp, he was very child-like, hurt easily and showing it easily, so delighted to read his poems to his mother and glowing when she said something nice, and so on, and so with the soul back, he might regress to a very child-like state which includes manipulation, &#8220;It&#8217;s not fair,&#8221; obvious lies, whining, and of course being a brat any time Angel (Dad) is around.
</p>
<p>
I did quite go off Spike when the whole in-love-with-Buffy phase started, mostly because it seemed to be a commercial decision rather than a real characterization one, and it tried to make him far too sympathetic too soon. If AtS can take this and reframe it to make him frequently obnoxious to the rest of the cast but entertaining and interesting to the audience, I think that&#8217;d be a great tack.
</p>
<p>
I was wondering if I was the only one to give up the TwoP recaps&#8211;increasingly, it seems to me as though the recappers (not just for Buffy and Angel) are constantly jumping up and down shouting, &#8220;Lookkit ME! Lookkit MEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!&#8221; and riding their own hobbyhorses to exhaustion, instead of some of the genuinely funny and insightful writing that had been there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babbster</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583/angel-review-unleashed/comment-page-1#comment-6540</link>
		<dc:creator>Babbster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583#comment-6540</guid>
		<description>Re: Excusing the Werewolf Rehash
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;Wes doesn&#039;t count?&lt;br&gt;
How &#039;bout Wes, Fred &lt;b&gt;and&lt;/b&gt; Lorne? Wes does the occasional spell, 
Fred 
does the dimensional rip thing, Lorne reads souls...
&lt;p&gt;
Why don&#039;t they count again?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
They don&#039;t count because they&#039;re not going to walk into a random room and throw knives with their mind, teleport people a mile into the air, flay the skin from someone&#039;s body with a gesture, etc.  There&#039;s a pretty clear Buffyverse line between people who read words from a book (Wesley/Fred) or have one specialized magical ability (Lorne) and folks who have the ability to do just about anything they want with the magic inherent to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Excusing the Werewolf Rehash</p>
<blockquote TYPE="cite"><p>Wes doesn&#8217;t count?<br />
How &#8217;bout Wes, Fred <b>and</b> Lorne? Wes does the occasional spell,<br />
Fred<br />
does the dimensional rip thing, Lorne reads souls&#8230;</p>
<p>
Why don&#8217;t they count again?
</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
They don&#8217;t count because they&#8217;re not going to walk into a random room and throw knives with their mind, teleport people a mile into the air, flay the skin from someone&#8217;s body with a gesture, etc.  There&#8217;s a pretty clear Buffyverse line between people who read words from a book (Wesley/Fred) or have one specialized magical ability (Lorne) and folks who have the ability to do just about anything they want with the magic inherent to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: y42</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583/angel-review-unleashed/comment-page-1#comment-6538</link>
		<dc:creator>y42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583#comment-6538</guid>
		<description>Re: Matters of Choice
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;
Actually, IIRC, they mentioned that the dinner party group had been shut 
down, well before the month had passed. 
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

&quot;Tonight may not be salvagable, but my guests have paid a high price. 
Some higher than others, and I promised them a werewolf!&quot; 
(cryptozoologist gets biten) &quot;And a month from now you&#039;ll have one.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;
And later on Gunn says that the &quot;bistro of the bizarre has been shut 
down&quot;
&lt;p&gt;
So I dunno</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Matters of Choice</p>
<blockquote TYPE="cite"><p>
Actually, IIRC, they mentioned that the dinner party group had been shut<br />
down, well before the month had passed.
</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Tonight may not be salvagable, but my guests have paid a high price.<br />
Some higher than others, and I promised them a werewolf!&#8221;<br />
(cryptozoologist gets biten) &#8220;And a month from now you&#8217;ll have one.&#8221;</p>
<p>
And later on Gunn says that the &#8220;bistro of the bizarre has been shut<br />
down&#8221;
</p>
<p>
So I dunno</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: y42</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583/angel-review-unleashed/comment-page-1#comment-6537</link>
		<dc:creator>y42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583#comment-6537</guid>
		<description>Re: Excusing the Werewolf Rehash
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;
It&#039;s just as hard to believe that they haven&#039;t put a magic-user type (with 
limitations, of course, as they did with Willow on BTVS) on the team 
(Wesley doesn&#039;t count).
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
Wes doesn&#039;t count?&lt;br&gt;
How &#039;bout Wes, Fred &lt;b&gt;and&lt;/b&gt; Lorne? Wes does the occasional spell, 
Fred 
does the dimensional rip thing, Lorne reads souls...
&lt;p&gt;
Why don&#039;t they count again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Excusing the Werewolf Rehash</p>
<blockquote TYPE="cite"><p>
It&#8217;s just as hard to believe that they haven&#8217;t put a magic-user type (with<br />
limitations, of course, as they did with Willow on BTVS) on the team<br />
(Wesley doesn&#8217;t count).
</p></blockquote>
<p>Wes doesn&#8217;t count?<br />
How &#8217;bout Wes, Fred <b>and</b> Lorne? Wes does the occasional spell,<br />
Fred<br />
does the dimensional rip thing, Lorne reads souls&#8230;</p>
<p>
Why don&#8217;t they count again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwistyHat</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583/angel-review-unleashed/comment-page-1#comment-6535</link>
		<dc:creator>TwistyHat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583#comment-6535</guid>
		<description>Re: Oddness from Spike?
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;Yeah, I had to stop reading TWoP because of Strega and her gang of caustic avengers/people-who-hate.&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Heh, homos with out pity is all about hating. If they could coordinate the hate they could move a small moon *G*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Oddness from Spike?</p>
<blockquote TYPE="cite"><p>Yeah, I had to stop reading TWoP because of Strega and her gang of caustic avengers/people-who-hate.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Heh, homos with out pity is all about hating. If they could coordinate the hate they could move a small moon *G*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nkuzmik</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583/angel-review-unleashed/comment-page-1#comment-6532</link>
		<dc:creator>nkuzmik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2003 16:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583#comment-6532</guid>
		<description>Re: Matters of Choice
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;
&lt;i&gt;The only other new element was Angel choosing 
deliberately not to save a person near the end.&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
I assume that we are talking about the doctor who got 
bit in the end.&lt;p&gt; I  would guess Angel&#039;s rational  for 
that was  that the doc was a bad guy anyway.  Siveling 
coward, yes, but he was still going to eat Nina alive with 
the rest of them, just because they could!&lt;p&gt;
This wanton cruelty would resonate with Angel.  Killing 
and eating someone just because you can is 
something &lt;i&gt;Angelus&lt;/i&gt; would do.  If those people 
were there to eat werewolf  in order to gain something, 
health, strength, better than viagra, whatever, that would 
have at least mitigated their actions. But there was no &lt;
i&gt;need&lt;/i&gt; on thier part.&lt;p&gt;This would pretty much take 
anybody in that room off Angel&#039;s christmas list.  That 
said, the only lives in the room he cared about were 
Nina and his crew.  If they want to eat one of their own, 
call it population control.  &lt;p&gt;Anybody have any other 
theories on Angels motives there?&lt;p&gt;BTW, I think he 
killed the werewolf in the begining because there was 
the threat to the girl, sunrise presumably wasn&#039;t for a 
few hours and he had no means of containment. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Matters of Choice</p>
<blockquote TYPE="cite"><p>
<i>The only other new element was Angel choosing<br />
deliberately not to save a person near the end.</i>
</p></blockquote>
<p>I assume that we are talking about the doctor who got<br />
bit in the end.
<p> I  would guess Angel&#8217;s rational  for<br />
that was  that the doc was a bad guy anyway.  Siveling<br />
coward, yes, but he was still going to eat Nina alive with<br />
the rest of them, just because they could!</p>
<p>
This wanton cruelty would resonate with Angel.  Killing<br />
and eating someone just because you can is<br />
something <i>Angelus</i> would do.  If those people<br />
were there to eat werewolf  in order to gain something,<br />
health, strength, better than viagra, whatever, that would<br />
have at least mitigated their actions. But there was no < i>need on thier part.</p>
<p>This would pretty much take<br />
anybody in that room off Angel&#8217;s christmas list.  That<br />
said, the only lives in the room he cared about were<br />
Nina and his crew.  If they want to eat one of their own,<br />
call it population control.  </p>
<p>Anybody have any other<br />
theories on Angels motives there?</p>
<p>BTW, I think he<br />
killed the werewolf in the begining because there was<br />
the threat to the girl, sunrise presumably wasn&#8217;t for a<br />
few hours and he had no means of containment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teraph</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583/angel-review-unleashed/comment-page-1#comment-6513</link>
		<dc:creator>teraph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 23:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/1583#comment-6513</guid>
		<description>Re: Oddness from Spike?
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;
My problem with &#039;classic manipulative Spike&#039; is that really hasn&#039;t been a side of Spike we&#039;ve seen since the soul (iirc).  The Yoko Factor was the last time he was *that* manipulative - it was pretty dark on the morally ambiguous scale.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Spike really hasn&#039;t had many opportunities to be manipulative since then.  Being an in-your-face kinda guy has worked well for him, and meeting his goals.  But now, he&#039;s sinking into hell, too proud to ask Angel for help, and needs someone to focus on his problem.  He thought he had that before, but then Fred started to focus on the werewolf problem.  Now, he has her undivided attention.  (The fact that he became fully opaque after Fred promised to work on nothing but his problem suggests he had some control.)&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;Spike doesn&#039;t manipulate unless it is the best way of meeting his goals.  If something more direct would work, then he does that.  He tried being direct with Fred (&quot;I&#039;m sinking into hell&quot;) and it wasn&#039;t long until she was working on other problems.  Now, he&#039;s inspired fear, pity and sympathy.  I imagine if the first try had created the reults he wanted, he wouldn&#039;t have had to be more manipulative.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Oddness from Spike?</p>
<blockquote TYPE="cite"><p>
My problem with &#8216;classic manipulative Spike&#8217; is that really hasn&#8217;t been a side of Spike we&#8217;ve seen since the soul (iirc).  The Yoko Factor was the last time he was *that* manipulative &#8211; it was pretty dark on the morally ambiguous scale.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Spike really hasn&#8217;t had many opportunities to be manipulative since then.  Being an in-your-face kinda guy has worked well for him, and meeting his goals.  But now, he&#8217;s sinking into hell, too proud to ask Angel for help, and needs someone to focus on his problem.  He thought he had that before, but then Fred started to focus on the werewolf problem.  Now, he has her undivided attention.  (The fact that he became fully opaque after Fred promised to work on nothing but his problem suggests he had some control.)</p>
<p>Spike doesn&#8217;t manipulate unless it is the best way of meeting his goals.  If something more direct would work, then he does that.  He tried being direct with Fred (&#8220;I&#8217;m sinking into hell&#8221;) and it wasn&#8217;t long until she was working on other problems.  Now, he&#8217;s inspired fear, pity and sympathy.  I imagine if the first try had created the reults he wanted, he wouldn&#8217;t have had to be more manipulative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
