bureau42.com      

bureau42.com email
Check your mail, or get a free address

Add to Google

part of the everyone.net Entertainment Network

Dreamhost Web Hosting

Problems with the site? Comments? Questions? Let us know!

 
welcome to bureau42.com
 
Jake 2.0 Cancelled
posted January 16 2004, 8:26 pm by fiziko

Category: TV Series Anonymous Coward writes, According to this article, linked from the Jake 2.0 TVTome pages, Jake 2.0 has been cancelled, 3 of the 4 unaired episodes (of the 16 produced in a 22 episode order) may be shown by UPN. In it's place is Yet Another Reality Show called "The Player" *yawn*. It's too bad. I thought Jake was beginning to hit its stride, but it didn't run fast enough from the TV Monster, scoring the lowest ratings among TV dramas, this season.

Read more... ( 21 comments already posted ) | ( Post a comment )


<< Whatever happened to Tru?  | Post a comment | Book Review - "The Hand Of Oberon" >>

 Comments

Wha?
posted by dgswensen on January 17 2004, 12:17 am
My god, reality shows are going to destroy everything, aren't they?

I mean, what the hell... haven't people had enough yet?


reply to this

Re: Wha?
posted by is on January 17 2004, 6:29 am
My god, reality shows are going to destroy everything, aren't they?

I mean, what the hell... haven't people had enough yet?

As much as I didn't like Jake 2.0, I agree with this comment... reality shows are quick easy money... it's jerry springer with class. trash tv. These stupid networks are aiming for the lowest tv watcher and ignoring the intelligent.

Morons.

reply to this

Re: Wha?
posted by Temsi on January 19 2004, 1:41 pm
These stupid networks are aiming for the lowest tv watcher and ignoring the intelligent.

Morons.
While this is true, I think most of the intelligent viewers who were watching TV at the same time Jake 2.0 was on, were tuned into The West Wing... So this doesn't really have anything to do with the intelligence of the viewer, as much as it has to do with ratings and advertising revenue. Statistics show that there's a higher percentage of stupid tv viewers than intelligent, so if you're a Network Exec going after ratings, pandering to the morons is one surefire way to do that.

reply to this

Dammit
posted by Trekkie on January 17 2004, 8:22 am
i'm so sick of these pricks cancelling shit for the idiot of the day, er, reality show. I don't watch a single one of them. Now there are like 4 shows I watch regularly thanks to that cancellation.

reply to this

Re: Dammit
posted by ixitar on January 20 2004, 11:09 am
i'm so sick of these pricks cancelling shit for the idiot of the day, er, reality show. I don't watch a single one of them. Now there are like 4 shows I watch regularly thanks to that cancellation.
Look at it this way. If this reality TV trend keeps up, then you won't need to buy a new HDTV. Why spend money to watch high definition crap.

I thought that I would have been one of the early adopters of HDTV. I cannot justify spending the money on the equipment with the quality of programming today. The only thing that I have scheduled on my TiVo this evening is the local news and I fast forward through most of the segments.


reply to this

foreshadowing
posted by y42 on January 17 2004, 2:29 pm
I never watched it. I knew they would just go and cancel it mid season anyway, so why even bother getting attached?

Reality shows get the best ratings, not because they're worth watching, but because there's nothing else on and only the brainless fans of those shows watch TV anymore, everyone else is fleeing to videogames, the net, or the woods.

So, lets start a pool: How long until Tru Calling doesn,t get anymore do- over days? I say right at the end of sweeps...


reply to this

expletive deleted
posted by vanyel on January 18 2004, 12:05 pm
It wasn't the best show ever, but it was good. It's clear that a new support model has to be developed for TV shows: there's got to be a way that those of who like *good* tv can arrange to get it. Are we going to have to go to PPV series?

reply to this

Re: expletive deleted
posted by y42 on January 18 2004, 1:30 pm
It wasn't the best show ever, but it was good. It's clear that a new support model has to be developed for TV shows: there's got to be a way that those of who like *good* tv can arrange to get it. Are we going to have to go to PPV series?
Well, the Neilsen ratings are the God All Mighty of TV: They determine who stays and who goes. One company is in charge of deciding every station and network's show ratings, and the ratings decide wich one thrive and wich don't.

So, I take the torch, you grab that yonder pitch fork and we'll go down to the Neilsen's building and discuss this thing...


reply to this

Re: expletive deleted
posted by fiziko on January 18 2004, 3:15 pm
So, I take the torch, you grab that yonder pitch fork and we'll go down to the Neilsen's building and discuss this thing...

I say we talk them into using TiVo stats. TiVo isn't available where I am yet, but I'm confident that the skew in the statistics will be favourable for the shows I watch. :)


reply to this

Re: expletive deleted
posted by vanyel on January 19 2004, 12:22 pm
I say we talk them into using TiVo stats.
Fine with me --- I *do* have Tivo ;-) But eventually, everyone will have one, and it'll just be the same thing all over again, so we really do need to find a way for niche shows to succeed...

reply to this

Re: expletive deleted
posted by radter on February 18 2004, 3:15 pm
Speaking of which, I did a Nielson diary recently. I don't watch reality shows so they didn't get any of my votes. I watched Jake 2.0 every week till it was replaced with The Newest Spank Model Show.

Now I watch Angel when there's nothing good on Sci-fi or I end up watching my Stargate dvds again.

The execs should just remember, reality shows are just the newest fad. They're here till people get bored of the mindless idiocy and want something with substance.

Here's a thought, the reality shows make Married with Children look like The Einsteins.

reply to this

Re: expletive deleted
posted by dan on April 20 2004, 5:51 pm
This comment is illegal. If you are going to elicit people to commit felonies such as arson, you might want to consider not doing it on the Internet.

reply to this

Re: expletive deleted
posted by colonypod on January 19 2004, 12:27 pm
It wasn't the best show ever, but it was good. It's clear that a new support model has to be developed for TV shows: there's got to be a way that those of who like *good* tv can arrange to get it. Are we going to have to go to PPV series?
I thought this show had its moments... I think, like any show, it would've taken a little while to get its legs. I've been thinking about the PPV idea as well... are we going to have straight-to-DVD series? I'd probably pay $40 for a Battlestar Galactica box set, for example... but I guess you'd need 500,000 households to feel the same way...

reply to this

Jake is a great character
posted by jboushka on January 23 2004, 8:08 pm
I hope that UPN reads these comments and reconsiders. The biggest problem was that Jake 2.0 was aired against The West Wing. Did they know that The West Wing won the HRC (Human Rights Campaign) prize at the dinner in Washington DC this year? It is silly to measure a new show against it. I'm not sure that it should be aired the same night as TheWB's Smallville. There is a basic similarity of the character to Clark Kent in Smallville. But Jake is much funnier (as Christopher Gorham plays him), and seems to have no character flaws at all (he is a bit silly before the accident). He is a great role model. He always reaches for the moral high ground, never misuses his "gifts" and challenges his superiors to do the right thing. There is no red kryptonite here. I have several suggestions. (1) Run it on a different night (2) sell it to another network (Bravo, Showtime, SciFi, or TheWB "Frog," because maybe it really does fit TheWB "young adult drama" mix, although it is a bit of competition for Smallville (3) David Greenwalt approaches a movie studio or gets investors together for a feature movie (maybe an indie). Maybe Miramax/Dimension, maybe Sony Screen Gems, maybe even New Line. Maybe you make it really funny and witty (Christopher Gorham could do this, whereas an actor like Welling could not) and get it into Sundance. But the show is too good to let it die out of shortsightedness. UPN, please read this. Don't throw this away out of neglect, find a buyer who will keep it going (and put on the three episodes in Feb on a different night.) I make some comments on Jake 2.0 (mixed with others) at http://www.hppub.com/movies/mpotter.htm (many reviews on that page) I am Bill Boushka JBoushka@aol.com info to reach me at http://www.hppub.com/info.htm Thanks!!

reply to this

Re: Jake is a great character
posted by jboushka on January 24 2004, 6:08 am
I've put this at http://doaskdotell.com/jake.htm because Google will find it quickly and I hope UPN executives will read this. They don't realize they've got this one all wrong. This is a tremendous property for the right distributor or broadcast company.
I hope that UPN reads these comments and reconsiders. The biggest problem was that Jake 2.0 was aired against The West Wing. Did they know that The West Wing won the HRC (Human Rights Campaign) prize at the dinner in Washington DC this year? It is silly to measure a new show against it. I'm not sure that it should be aired the same night as TheWB's Smallville. There is a basic similarity of the character to Clark Kent in Smallville. But Jake is much funnier (as Christopher Gorham plays him), and seems to have no character flaws at all (he is a bit silly before the accident). He is a great role model. He always reaches for the moral high ground, never misuses his "gifts" and challenges his superiors to do the right thing. There is no red kryptonite here. I have several suggestions. (1) Run it on a different night (2) sell it to another network (Bravo, Showtime, SciFi, or TheWB "Frog," because maybe it really does fit TheWB "young adult drama" mix, although it is a bit of competition for Smallville (3) David Greenwalt approaches a movie studio or gets investors together for a feature movie (maybe an indie). Maybe Miramax/Dimension, maybe Sony Screen Gems, maybe even New Line. Maybe you make it really funny and witty (Christopher Gorham could do this, whereas an actor like Welling could not) and get it into Sundance. But the show is too good to let it die out of shortsightedness. UPN, please read this. Don't throw this away out of neglect, find a buyer who will keep it going (and put on the three episodes in Feb on a different night.) I make some comments on Jake 2.0 (mixed with others) at http://www.hppub.com/movies/mpotter.htm (many reviews on that page) I am Bill Boushka JBoushka@aol.com info to reach me at http://www.hppub.com/info.htm Thanks!!

reply to this

Re: Jake is a great character
posted by msg on January 28 2004, 7:15 pm
Jake 2.0 had a truely original combination of characters and traits and I thought it showed more promise than any of the newer star trek first year runs (Voyager, Deep Space Nine, Enterprise). It is #1 of 2 shows I watch during the week #2 being Enterprise which I thought would fail first. Wednesday night from 8:00 - 10:00 was a techie geeks dream come true. I can't believe they are airing a show about supermodels in J2.0's place. I like 'em as much as the next guy but I don't need a reality show about them. Please labotomize me an make me watch "The Dukes of Hazzard" reruns (for those of you that remember them), anything but another reality show. To be perfectly honest I would prefer a woman like Doctor Diane Hughes (Keegan Connor Tracy), a character that represents intelligence and beauty over a dim-witted super model, if I had the chance. I like brains as much as beauty. Tall order which Keegan fills in her part on the show if you ask me. Maybe a letter writting campaign to Sci-Fi to pick up Jake2.0 would be a better use or resources than wasting time on UPN who obviously doesn't have a clue unless it were on a balance sheet labeled "huge profit". Atleast Sci-Fi knows how to do science fiction right and keep it right! Look at all their successful original programming. Since there is nothing worth watching I'm going to get my frustration out in UT2K3. Later all.

reply to this

write-in campaign
posted by LJC on January 26 2004, 8:09 pm
A write-in campaign has been mounted and going for several weeks now, to try and get UPN to air the final 4 episodes. Please, join in and spread the word!

reply to this

save Jake 2.0
posted by EllisT on February 4 2004, 9:04 am
I just want to say that I am a very loyal fan of the series. I didn't even realize that it had been cancelled until I found out via this website. It appears that the reality shows such as Top Model have a good size fan base, but I wanted people to know that I feel Jake 2.0 is a much better show than the reality shows. In fact, I hardly ever watch brand new shows because lately they seem to all be sitcoms or reality shows. Jake had a lot of potential and I think it's terrible that it got cancelled so quickly. I sincerely hope that it will be given the chance to be aired on a different night, and I really want to see the last 4 episodes that UPN has decided not to air. I plan to write the powers that be at UPN and voice my opinion there to. EllisT

reply to this

Re: save Jake 2.0
posted by ser on March 10 2004, 10:06 pm
My whole family is a loyal fan of the Jake series, especially my 9 year old. This is ONE of the times we can all sit together. We are not pleased it was cancelled and are sickened by all the reality-dud programs. SAVE JAKE!!!!! Ser

reply to this

Re: save Jake 2.0
posted by Jake_2.1 on May 1 2004, 4:07 pm
Cancelling Jake2.0 is stupid, It makes me wonder why here in England they bought the rights to view this if there is only going to be 16 episodes or what ever it is. I just hope that they won't cancel Cold Case or the Handler.
My whole family is a loyal fan of the Jake series, especially my 9 year old. This is ONE of the times we can all sit together. We are not pleased it was cancelled and are sickened by all the reality-dud programs. SAVE JAKE!!!!! Ser

reply to this

jake 2.0
posted by sexysiren on June 20 2004, 2:28 pm
I THINK JAKE 2.0 WAS BETTER THAN SOME OF THE PROGRAMMES SHOWN ON SKY ONE. OKAY IT WAS SLOW TO START WITH BUT BECAMME MORE INTERESTING AS IT WENT ALONG. SOME OF YOU WHO DIDN'T THINK IT WAS GOOD WERE CRAZY! OKAY COMPARED TO 24 IT DOESN'T COMPARE BUT ITS BETTER THAN LAS VEGAS AND TRU CALLING! AND ESPECIALLY BIG BROTHER 1 2 3 4 ETC, YOU GET THE POINT!

reply to this



<< Whatever happened to Tru?  | Post a comment | Book Review - "The Hand Of Oberon" >>
 
Current Headlines
Fringe Discussion: "The Equation" (0)
Weekly Comics Discussion - November 19, 2008 (0)
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles: "Complications" (4)
Heroes Discussion: It's Coming (1)
Star Trek Trailer Now Online (5)
Comic Films (0)
LHC Rap (0)
Weekend Review - "Quantum of Solace" (8)

Other SF Sites
Sci-Fi Storm

"The Genesis of Doctor Who" notes available at the BBC
<i>Robotech</i> feature gets new writers, rewrite
<i>Star Trek</i> trailers now live
The Phoenix Comicon Shows the Enterprise's Data Some Fun
<i>World War Z</i> gets direction from Marc Forster
One pickup, one axe, and one beer...
Image of new Enterprise
<i>Knight Rider</i> gets downsized, rebooted
Johnston to direct <i>First Avenger: Captain America</i>
John Williams/Star Wars a capella tribute
STARTREK.COM - Headlines

Next Remastered Episode: "Tomorrow Is Yesterday"
Keep the conversation going on StarTrek.com boards
Okuda Logo for New Lunar Lander Unveiled
"InAlienable" Premieres, "Of Gods & Men" Soon!
Jerry Goldsmith: A Personal Reminiscence
TNG20: It Was Twenty Years Ago Today (December 1987)
EDITOR'S PICK: Suzie Plakson - "Good Luck Charm" CD
Etchstar Customized iPod nano Giveaway
ASK KATE: Trekkies, Trekkers, Which Is It?
POLL: Which TNG "gift" would you like this holiday season?

Other Random Cool Sites
Ars Technica

Scientists see political attacks as badge of pride
Eulogy for a good friend: RIP, twisted pair telephone line
Google copyright deal moves forward
Co-op resurrected: Ars reviews Left 4 Dead
WiFi goes green: solar-powered outdoor nodes coming soon
Tennessee anti-P2P law to cost colleges over $13 million
US court orders keylogger CyberSpy to halt software sales
Judge slaps down Psystar's antitrust claims against Apple
HP previews strong fourth quarter
Who's top in tech policy? Our new "People to Watch" list
Kodak sues LG and Samsung over alleged patent violations
Crowdsourcing patent startup could use dose of own medicine
Hands on: Google lets you search with your voice on iPhone
Australian police warn that racing games breed bad drivers
Study: many young people want to do their banking over IM
Microsoft on the cloud: Sharepoint and Exchange go Online
A feature guide to current-generation gaming consoles
Sirius, XM subscribers revolt over merger-induced changes
Game on: NVIDIA, PS3 hardware in Top 500 Supercomputers list
Hands on: Zenbe's social, collaborative e-mail works well
[H]ardOCP News/Article Feed

Microsoft Announces Plans for No-Cost Consumer Security Offering
AMD Publishes Results of Major European Survey
G4saurus Defectus
Gigabyte EX58-Extreme Mobo Sneak Peek
CPG Files for Bankruptcy Protection
[H]ardware Round-Up II
Fashion Your Firefox
DivX Sues Yahoo Over Canceled Ad Deal
Gaming News
Sony Claims 14 Million PSN Users
New 'Halo'-esque Look for Korea's Troops
[H]ardware Round-Up
Spansion Sues Samsung Over Flash Patents
iPhone Numeric Keypad App
[H]ot Deal Of The Day
AMD Analyst Day November 2008
Fallout 3 Gameplay Performance and Image Quality
Your Mail in Rebate May Be In Jeopardy
Intel Core i7 920 Overclocking and Power
OCZ 700W ModXStream Pro Power Supply
ASUS Rampage II Extreme
Galaxy GeForce GTX 260+ Overclocked Version
Intel Core i7 920 Overclocking and Heat
ASUS P6T Deluxe
Intel Core i7 and Gaming
Intel Core i7 Application Results
Intel Core i7 Synthetic Benchmarks
EVGA 790i SLI FTW Motherboard
FarCry 2 Gameplay Performance
Gigabyte GA-EP45T-Extreme
Slashdot

Ray Kurzweil Wonders Can Machines Ever Have Souls?
Fewer Than 1% Arrested From TSA's "Behavior Detection"
Psystar Antitrust Claim Against Apple Dismissed
Oldest Nuclear Family Found Murdered In Germany
The Importance of Procedural Content Generation In Games
Court Slams Door On Sale of Spyware
Should You Get Paid While Your Computer Boots?
Ted Stevens Loses Senate Re-Election Bid
Microsoft To Offer Free Anti-Virus Software
NASA Tests Deep-Space Network Modeled On the Internet
McColo Briefly Returns, Hands Off Botnet Control
Google To Host 10M Images From Life Magazine's Archive
The Neurological Basis of Con Games
Secure OS Gets Highest NSA Rating, Goes Commercial
The ISS Marks 10 Years In Space


Want our headlines on your site? You can snag our RSS file and go to town. (RDF/RSS parser sold separately.) All site content © and owned by its author - for the full skinny, read the legal disclaimers bit.