|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Check your mail, or get a free address
|
Cast and CrewDavid Boreanaz as AngelAlexis Denisof as Wesley Wyndham-Pryce J. August Richards as Charles Gunn Amy Acker as Fred Burkle Andy Hallett as Lorne James Marsters as Spike Written by Drew Goddard and Steven S. DeKnight Directed by Terrence O'Hara Original Airdate1943 originally aired on Wednesday, February 11, 2004.SynopsisAngel once sired a man who is unsatisfied with his subsequent existence. High Point"Yes, I am." Low PointOddly, "Yes, I am." On one hand, it was a great line. On the other hand, there's no reason for Angel to allow the subsequent action at that point in his life. He just wouldn't set Spike free, knowing what he was capable of. They needed better motivation there. The ReviewThe originality is not that great. We've seen this sort of thing back in the sixth season of The X-Files, among others. The interesting twist is a possible addition to vampire lore, dealing with the more recent sirings of Angel and Spike. Could this be foreshadowing an event later this season? Perhaps we haven't met the individual at the centre of the Shan-Shu prophecy yet. I give it 4 out of 6. The effects were, as usual, well implemented versions of effects they've used before. I give it 5 out of 6. The story is interesting. Apart from the above flaw, it was fairly well written, particularly in drawing the parallels between the Nazi work and the Initiative. The potential implications for future events are also interesting. I give it 5 out of 6. The acting worked better than usual tonight. David Boreanaz' bland and bored style really worked for a time in Angel's life when he really didn't want to be where he was. I give it 5 out of 6. The emotional response this produced was a bit weak. The problem with setting episodes in the past like this is that we automatically know there are limitations on what impact they can have, assuming they'll be consistent with the show's established continuity. The constant alternations between past and present helped this, as there was the chance that something would happen now that would change the future. I give it 4 out of 6. The production was the usual Mutant Enemy quality. The camera work was less interesting than usual, but that was probably a limitation of the space used for filming more than anything else. I give it 5 out of 6. Overall, it was an entertaining episode, but the only way it might deserve a spot in the sweeps period is if it really is being used to establish future events in the Angelverse. I give it 4 out of 6. In total, 1943 receives 32 out of 42.
|
|
|
Want our headlines on your site? You can snag our RSS file and go to town. (RDF/RSS parser sold
separately.) All site content © and owned by its author - for the
full skinny, read the legal disclaimers bit.
|