bureau42.com      

bureau42.com email
Check your mail, or get a free address

Add to Google

part of the everyone.net Entertainment Network

Dreamhost Web Hosting

Problems with the site? Comments? Questions? Let us know!

 
welcome to bureau42.com
 
Angel Review - "1943"
posted February 11 2004, 7:18 pm by fiziko

Category: Buffy WARNING: There are spoilers in both the Low Point and Originality portions of this review.

Read more... ( 12 comments already posted ) | ( 3613 bytes in body ) | ( Post a comment )


<< Smallville Discussion - "Velocity"  | Post a comment | Comic Review - "Secret War: Book One" >>

Cast and Crew

David Boreanaz as Angel
Alexis Denisof as Wesley Wyndham-Pryce
J. August Richards as Charles Gunn
Amy Acker as Fred Burkle
Andy Hallett as Lorne
James Marsters as Spike
Written by Drew Goddard and Steven S. DeKnight
Directed by Terrence O'Hara

Original Airdate

1943 originally aired on Wednesday, February 11, 2004.

Synopsis

Angel once sired a man who is unsatisfied with his subsequent existence.

High Point

"Yes, I am."

Low Point

Oddly, "Yes, I am." On one hand, it was a great line. On the other hand, there's no reason for Angel to allow the subsequent action at that point in his life. He just wouldn't set Spike free, knowing what he was capable of. They needed better motivation there.

The Review

The originality is not that great. We've seen this sort of thing back in the sixth season of The X-Files, among others. The interesting twist is a possible addition to vampire lore, dealing with the more recent sirings of Angel and Spike. Could this be foreshadowing an event later this season? Perhaps we haven't met the individual at the centre of the Shan-Shu prophecy yet. I give it 4 out of 6.

The effects were, as usual, well implemented versions of effects they've used before. I give it 5 out of 6.

The story is interesting. Apart from the above flaw, it was fairly well written, particularly in drawing the parallels between the Nazi work and the Initiative. The potential implications for future events are also interesting. I give it 5 out of 6.

The acting worked better than usual tonight. David Boreanaz' bland and bored style really worked for a time in Angel's life when he really didn't want to be where he was. I give it 5 out of 6.

The emotional response this produced was a bit weak. The problem with setting episodes in the past like this is that we automatically know there are limitations on what impact they can have, assuming they'll be consistent with the show's established continuity. The constant alternations between past and present helped this, as there was the chance that something would happen now that would change the future. I give it 4 out of 6.

The production was the usual Mutant Enemy quality. The camera work was less interesting than usual, but that was probably a limitation of the space used for filming more than anything else. I give it 5 out of 6.

Overall, it was an entertaining episode, but the only way it might deserve a spot in the sweeps period is if it really is being used to establish future events in the Angelverse. I give it 4 out of 6.

In total, 1943 receives 32 out of 42.



 Comments

Next week on Angel...
posted by Mr. Vapor on February 11 2004, 7:56 pm
...WTF!

The storyline for next week seems a bit far-fetched; but then, I've already
accepted the premise of a Vampire with a soul so what's a few muppets?

It had better be hilarious. My hopes are high, and the puppet looks well-
crafted.

and the Nazi episode was better than expected - it didn't go the way i had
expected, so that was good (I'm actually extremely grateful that Spike wasn't
a Nazi, that would have been way to cliche).

reply to this

Re: Next week on Angel...
posted by encaf1 on February 13 2004, 10:34 am
...WTF!

The storyline for next week seems a bit far-fetched; but then, I've already
accepted the premise of a Vampire with a soul so what's a few muppets?

It had better be hilarious. My hopes are high, and the puppet looks well-
crafted.

I was kinda wondering whether this episode would feature a return of Sid, the talking dummy from very early in Buffy. I seem to recall that he already returned once, however, and was killed off..

I have to admit, when I first saw a cap from the episode, I was skeptical -- but then again, the very strangest of things tends to make the best shows..


reply to this

Re: Next week on Angel...
posted by fiziko on February 13 2004, 10:39 am

I was kinda wondering whether this episode would feature a return of Sid, the talking dummy from very early in Buffy. I seem to recall that he already returned once, however, and was killed off..

He died (well, was releaesed) at the end of his first appearance and hasn't returned.


reply to this

I was Rasputin's lover!
posted by y42 on February 11 2004, 10:06 pm
Hehehe, and its always fun to see a nosferatu in the buffy verse. Though they do die easy for vampires that old...gah, flashing back to the Buffy finale, augh, the badness...sigh.

reply to this

meh...
posted by UncleJam on February 12 2004, 8:55 am

Pretty much a dull episode, as I expected.

My high point was the new (in 1943) gov't department, the Demon Research Initiative. Heh. Oh, and the possible ultimate origin of Spike's chip? I guess it took Maggie Walsh 50+ years to replicate the Nazi research.

I also have a big problem with Lawson's vamping. I was under the impression that a vamp's victim dies, stays dead for a while, then rises as a new vampire. As in every frickin' new vampire we ever saw on Buffy. I mean, how many times did we see her waiting by some poor schlub's grave for him to claw his way out as a vampire? But Lawson is vamped by Angel and turned in a short enough span of time to save them all from oxygen deprivation? That doesn't make any sense to me. If victims become vampires immediately, how were any of the Sunnydale victims ever buried, let alone given a funeral (as implied by their dress)?

I actually think next week's episode, while gimmicky, looks kind of funny.


reply to this

Re: meh...
posted by Babbster on February 12 2004, 2:49 pm
Even on Buffy, there was some occasional variability in how long it took. For example, one of Angel's victims during season two woke up while being viewed in the funeral home (during the ep we found out Oz was a werewolf). Is it possible that it's a function of how much of the sire's blood the vampire drinks? I don't know. I only know that I noticed the same thing, shrugged and moved on. Like it or not, sometimes you've got to cut some corners for flow in a TV show. :)

reply to this

Re: meh...
posted by vandemar on February 12 2004, 2:52 pm

If victims become vampires immediately, how were any of the Sunnydale victims ever buried, let alone given a funeral (as implied by their dress)?

Just a wild guess here. Maybe it has to do with the amount of blood involved. Like say the length of time between death and undeath is proportionate to the volume of blood consumed by the sire divided by the volume of blood given for the vamping process. So in Lawson's case, he could have consumed a lot more blood from Angel than he lost himself.

Or maybe the victim must spend a certain amount of time completely hidden from the sun before rising. Hence the coffins and graveyards in the Sunnydale case. But since Lawson was stuck in a submarine for days or weeks already, he didn't require further dark time.


reply to this

Re: meh...
posted by y42 on February 12 2004, 4:06 pm
But Lawson is vamped by Angel and turned in a short enough span of time to save them all from oxygen deprivation? That doesn't make any sense to me.
  1. No one had ever been turned by a vamp with a soul.
  2. No one had ever been turned in a sub at high pressure.
  3. Like the other guy said, you don't know how much blood they usually use.
  4. And I'm sure Angel wasn't too worried about suffocating himself, and he's just extended the air time by making one guy not need to breathe anymore.

reply to this

Re: meh...
posted by encaf1 on February 13 2004, 10:49 am
  1. No one had ever been turned by a vamp with a soul.
  2. No one had ever been turned in a sub at high pressure.
  3. Like the other guy said, you don't know how much blood they usually use.
  4. And I'm sure Angel wasn't too worried about suffocating himself, and he's just extended the air time by making one guy not need to breathe anymore.

While I think everyone should just breath deeply and repeat "It's only a show" to themselves a few times, there are a few things to point out:

On point 1, when Spike returned to Buffy he had a soul. When his mind was on the fritz, he created several vampires. Apparently, they either needed to be buried or took long enough that were buried in the basement. (Curiously enough, although all of them had been turned at different times, they all emerged at the same time, which suggests a trap, a very variable turn time, or the presence of a human -- or the slayer -- triggered it.)

I would also point out that this turning was very much the Anne Rice style, and that vampires have been created in Buffy and Angel in just as much time. Part of it might be based on the will of the sire to turn them; it might also be the fact that the guy was just about dead to begin with, as opposed to most of the victims who had to die first.

I also made dramatic sense, and as most of Joss's minions and himself have said, the mythos is not meant to be consistent as it is to be dramatic.

And finally, vampirism is not a science, and may not entirely be describable with particular science. Tell me exactly how long bread is going to mold, and I will show you something you left out of your calculations. The truth is, we only have evidence by what we see, and it is much more organic, much more mystical, and much more multi-dimensional than that...

Whew! I'll hop off this orange crate that someone left me.. Whooops!


reply to this

Re: meh...
posted by babasyzygy on February 13 2004, 3:14 pm
[The TiVo said that this episode name was, "Why we fight," why are we calling it "1943"? ]

I think it might have a lot to do with the potentcy of the Vampire's blood - both the power of the vampire and the number of vampires he or she has sired.

Angel is from a very powerful line: The Master -> Darla -> Angelus. Angel is only two steps from the most powerful vampire we know of, active over human times. Even Spike is four steps away (Angelus -> Drusilla -> Spike), and has turned plenty of victims over the years.

So it's not unreasonable to think that Angel's blood would be far more potent than even Spike's. Angel is very powerful himself, and he hasn't diluted his mojo by turning victims left and right - he hasn't turned anyone in, what, over a hundred years?

reply to this

"1943"
posted by Tommy on February 13 2004, 1:58 pm
Great review! Please, though - refer to the episode by it's actual title ("Why We Fight"). "1943" is yet another example of the WB redefining things to suit their needs, like they did with "Apocolypse Nowish" last year. They renamed it "Rain of Fire" in their promos to attract more viewers, which is what I'm assuming is the case with calling this one "1943." It just steams me when corporate suits mess with the original intent of the writers/producers. Thanks - done venting. Really love the site!!!

reply to this

Re: "1943"
posted by fiziko on February 13 2004, 4:02 pm
Great review! Please, though - refer to the episode by it's actual title ("Why We Fight"). "1943" is yet another example of the WB redefining things to suit their needs, like they did with "Apocolypse Nowish" last year. They renamed it "Rain of Fire" in their promos to attract more viewers, which is what I'm assuming is the case with calling this one "1943."

The official WB site lists "1943" as the title. Of course, when they changed "Apocalypse Nowish," they changed it on the official site, too. I don't read the titles in advance anymore (spoilerish), so I go with whatever they list here on the night of the broadcast.


reply to this



<< Smallville Discussion - "Velocity"  | Post a comment | Comic Review - "Secret War: Book One" >>
 
Current Headlines
Weekly Comics Discussion - November 19, 2008 (0)
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles: "Complications" (4)
Heroes Discussion: It's Coming (1)
Star Trek Trailer Now Online (5)
Comic Films (0)
LHC Rap (0)
Weekend Review - "Quantum of Solace" (8)
Weekly Digital Disc Picks - November 18, 2008 (3)

Other SF Sites
Sci-Fi Storm

<i>Robotech</i> feature gets new writers, rewrite
<i>Star Trek</i> trailers now live
The Phoenix Comicon Shows the Enterprise's Data Some Fun
<i>World War Z</i> gets direction from Marc Forster
One pickup, one axe, and one beer...
Image of new Enterprise
<i>Knight Rider</i> gets downsized, rebooted
Johnston to direct <i>First Avenger: Captain America</i>
John Williams/Star Wars a capella tribute
<i>Lost</i> 5th season to start January 21st
STARTREK.COM - Headlines

Next Remastered Episode: "Tomorrow Is Yesterday"
Keep the conversation going on StarTrek.com boards
Okuda Logo for New Lunar Lander Unveiled
"InAlienable" Premieres, "Of Gods & Men" Soon!
Jerry Goldsmith: A Personal Reminiscence
TNG20: It Was Twenty Years Ago Today (December 1987)
EDITOR'S PICK: Suzie Plakson - "Good Luck Charm" CD
Etchstar Customized iPod nano Giveaway
ASK KATE: Trekkies, Trekkers, Which Is It?
POLL: Which TNG "gift" would you like this holiday season?

Other Random Cool Sites
Ars Technica

Google copyright deal moves forward
Co-op resurrected: Ars reviews Left 4 Dead
WiFi goes green: solar-powered outdoor nodes coming soon
Tennessee anti-P2P law to cost colleges over $13 million
US court orders keylogger CyberSpy to halt software sales
Judge slaps down Psystar's antitrust claims against Apple
HP previews strong fourth quarter
Who's top in tech policy? Our new "People to Watch" list
Kodak sues LG and Samsung over alleged patent violations
Crowdsourcing patent startup could use dose of own medicine
Hands on: Google lets you search with your voice on iPhone
Australian police warn that racing games breed bad drivers
Study: many young people want to do their banking over IM
Microsoft on the cloud: Sharepoint and Exchange go Online
A feature guide to current-generation gaming consoles
Sirius, XM subscribers revolt over merger-induced changes
Game on: NVIDIA, PS3 hardware in Top 500 Supercomputers list
Hands on: Zenbe's social, collaborative e-mail works well
Intel's 3.2GHz monster Nehalem roars onto the scene
Adobe to close desktop-mobile Flash Player gap with ARM port
[H]ardOCP News/Article Feed

G4saurus Defectus
Gigabyte EX58-Extreme Mobo Sneak Peek
CPG Files for Bankruptcy Protection
[H]ardware Round-Up II
Fashion Your Firefox
DivX Sues Yahoo Over Canceled Ad Deal
Gaming News
Sony Claims 14 Million PSN Users
New 'Halo'-esque Look for Korea's Troops
[H]ardware Round-Up
Spansion Sues Samsung Over Flash Patents
iPhone Numeric Keypad App
[H]ot Deal Of The Day
Identities Sold Online For Cheap
Velocity Micro First to Ship New Intel Core i7 Systems
AMD Analyst Day November 2008
Fallout 3 Gameplay Performance and Image Quality
Your Mail in Rebate May Be In Jeopardy
Intel Core i7 920 Overclocking and Power
OCZ 700W ModXStream Pro Power Supply
ASUS Rampage II Extreme
Galaxy GeForce GTX 260+ Overclocked Version
Intel Core i7 920 Overclocking and Heat
ASUS P6T Deluxe
Intel Core i7 and Gaming
Intel Core i7 Application Results
Intel Core i7 Synthetic Benchmarks
EVGA 790i SLI FTW Motherboard
FarCry 2 Gameplay Performance
Gigabyte GA-EP45T-Extreme
Slashdot

Psystar Antitrust Claim Against Apple Dismissed
Oldest Nuclear Family Found Murdered In Germany
The Importance of Procedural Content Generation In Games
Court Slams Door On Sale of Spyware
Should You Get Paid While Your Computer Boots?
Ted Stevens Loses Senate Re-Election Bid
Microsoft To Offer Free Anti-Virus Software
NASA Tests Deep-Space Network Modeled On the Internet
McColo Briefly Returns, Hands Off Botnet Control
Google To Host 10M Images From Life Magazine's Archive
The Neurological Basis of Con Games
Secure OS Gets Highest NSA Rating, Goes Commercial
The ISS Marks 10 Years In Space
New Generator Boosts Wind Turbine Efficiency 50%
HP's Fury At Vista Capable Downgrade


Want our headlines on your site? You can snag our RSS file and go to town. (RDF/RSS parser sold separately.) All site content © and owned by its author - for the full skinny, read the legal disclaimers bit.