<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forbes compares Star Wars to Star Trek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610/forbes-compares-star-wars-to-star-trek/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610/forbes-compares-star-wars-to-star-trek</link>
	<description>Bureau 42</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hck</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610/forbes-compares-star-wars-to-star-trek/comment-page-1#comment-13063</link>
		<dc:creator>hck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 19:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610#comment-13063</guid>
		<description>Re: Hmm
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;
And of course....

Star Wars has &#039;the force&#039;. Star Trek has Shatners girdle and toupee. What is more powerful? Trek of course! Shatner gets way more chicks than Yoda.

&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Cialis:&lt;br&gt;
If the force lasts more than four hours, seek help.
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

two things come to mind&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Hey hey hey now! I knew Riker had help! &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
and&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Don&#039;t worry Imzadi, it&#039;s only been 3 hours and forty-five minutes&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Hmm</p>
<blockquote TYPE="cite">
<blockquote TYPE="cite"><p>
And of course&#8230;.</p>
<p>Star Wars has &#8216;the force&#8217;. Star Trek has Shatners girdle and toupee. What is more powerful? Trek of course! Shatner gets way more chicks than Yoda.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Cialis:<br />
If the force lasts more than four hours, seek help.
</p></blockquote>
<p>two things come to mind<br />
<em>Hey hey hey now! I knew Riker had help! </em><br />
and<br />
<em>Don&#8217;t worry Imzadi, it&#8217;s only been 3 hours and forty-five minutes</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J_W_W</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610/forbes-compares-star-wars-to-star-trek/comment-page-1#comment-13023</link>
		<dc:creator>J_W_W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 20:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610#comment-13023</guid>
		<description>Re: A Sad commentary on American Culture ....
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;
....when art is valued by gross profit returned.

All hail the Corporation !

(helpful hint: if it&#039;s a &#039;franchise&#039; - it ain&#039;t art)
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
When I was 7 and first saw Star Wars, its gross profit had nothing to do with how much I liked it.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
And while I feel the Dune franchise of novels to be some of the best art in sci-fi that doesn&#039;t change the fact that my biggest soft spot in sci-fi is still for Star Wars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: A Sad commentary on American Culture &#8230;.</p>
<blockquote TYPE="cite"><p>
&#8230;.when art is valued by gross profit returned.</p>
<p>All hail the Corporation !</p>
<p>(helpful hint: if it&#8217;s a &#8216;franchise&#8217; &#8211; it ain&#8217;t art)
</p></blockquote>
<p>When I was 7 and first saw Star Wars, its gross profit had nothing to do with how much I liked it.</p>
<p>And while I feel the Dune franchise of novels to be some of the best art in sci-fi that doesn&#8217;t change the fact that my biggest soft spot in sci-fi is still for Star Wars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechnoGirl</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610/forbes-compares-star-wars-to-star-trek/comment-page-1#comment-13022</link>
		<dc:creator>TechnoGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 19:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610#comment-13022</guid>
		<description>A Sad commentary on American Culture ....
....when art is valued by gross profit returned.

All hail the Corporation !

(helpful hint: if it&#039;s a &#039;franchise&#039; - it ain&#039;t art)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Sad commentary on American Culture &#8230;.<br />
&#8230;.when art is valued by gross profit returned.</p>
<p>All hail the Corporation !</p>
<p>(helpful hint: if it&#8217;s a &#8216;franchise&#8217; &#8211; it ain&#8217;t art)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FarmerBob</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610/forbes-compares-star-wars-to-star-trek/comment-page-1#comment-13019</link>
		<dc:creator>FarmerBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 19:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610#comment-13019</guid>
		<description>Re: Hmm
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;
And of course....

Star Wars has &#039;the force&#039;. Star Trek has Shatners girdle and toupee. What is more powerful? Trek of course! Shatner gets way more chicks than Yoda.

&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

Cialis:&lt;br&gt;
If the force lasts more than four hours, seek help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Hmm</p>
<blockquote TYPE="cite"><p>
And of course&#8230;.</p>
<p>Star Wars has &#8216;the force&#8217;. Star Trek has Shatners girdle and toupee. What is more powerful? Trek of course! Shatner gets way more chicks than Yoda.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Cialis:<br />
If the force lasts more than four hours, seek help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madpoet_one</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610/forbes-compares-star-wars-to-star-trek/comment-page-1#comment-13018</link>
		<dc:creator>madpoet_one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 18:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610#comment-13018</guid>
		<description>Re: Hmm
And of course....

Star Wars has &#039;the force&#039;. Star Trek has Shatners girdle and toupee. What is more powerful? Trek of course! Shatner gets way more chicks than Yoda.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Hmm<br />
And of course&#8230;.</p>
<p>Star Wars has &#8216;the force&#8217;. Star Trek has Shatners girdle and toupee. What is more powerful? Trek of course! Shatner gets way more chicks than Yoda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J_W_W</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610/forbes-compares-star-wars-to-star-trek/comment-page-1#comment-13017</link>
		<dc:creator>J_W_W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 18:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610#comment-13017</guid>
		<description>Re: Hmm
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=&quot;cite&quot;&gt;
Well, regardless of the &quot;Which one has better plotlines&quot; and the &quot;Which one sold out more&quot; or &quot;which one&#039;s down-hill decent was faster/more drmatic&quot;, I&#039;d have to take Star Trek as better Science Fiction that Star Wars. Trek (in it&#039;s pre- Reverse-The-Polarity-On-The-Tachion-Deflector-Array-Emitter days) did have hard science at it&#039;s core. 
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You don&#039;t know the pooowwwer of Star Wars!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Hmm</p>
<blockquote TYPE="cite"><p>
Well, regardless of the &#8220;Which one has better plotlines&#8221; and the &#8220;Which one sold out more&#8221; or &#8220;which one&#8217;s down-hill decent was faster/more drmatic&#8221;, I&#8217;d have to take Star Trek as better Science Fiction that Star Wars. Trek (in it&#8217;s pre- Reverse-The-Polarity-On-The-Tachion-Deflector-Array-Emitter days) did have hard science at it&#8217;s core.
</p></blockquote>
<p>
You don&#8217;t know the pooowwwer of Star Wars!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jethro</title>
		<link>http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610/forbes-compares-star-wars-to-star-trek/comment-page-1#comment-13010</link>
		<dc:creator>Jethro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 16:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bureau42.com/view/2610#comment-13010</guid>
		<description>Hmm
Well, regardless of the &quot;Which one has better plotlines&quot; and the &quot;Which one sold out more&quot; or &quot;which one&#039;s down-hill decent was faster/more drmatic&quot;, I&#039;d have to take Star Trek as better Science Fiction that Star Wars. Trek (in it&#039;s pre- Reverse-The-Polarity-On-The-Tachion-Deflector-Array-Emitter days) did have hard science at it&#039;s core. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm<br />
Well, regardless of the &#8220;Which one has better plotlines&#8221; and the &#8220;Which one sold out more&#8221; or &#8220;which one&#8217;s down-hill decent was faster/more drmatic&#8221;, I&#8217;d have to take Star Trek as better Science Fiction that Star Wars. Trek (in it&#8217;s pre- Reverse-The-Polarity-On-The-Tachion-Deflector-Array-Emitter days) did have hard science at it&#8217;s core.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
