bureau42.com      

bureau42.com email
Check your mail, or get a free address

Add to Google

part of the everyone.net Entertainment Network

Dreamhost Web Hosting

Problems with the site? Comments? Questions? Let us know!

 
welcome to bureau42.com
 
Film Review: Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End
posted May 24 2007, 10:54 am by Eldhrin

Category: Movies An entertaining romp in which everybody gets rather wet.

Read more... ( 9 comments already posted ) | ( 4807 bytes in body ) | ( Post a comment )


<< Is there life on Mars? Chapter XVI  | Post a comment | Lost Season Finale Discussion >>

Principal Cast and Crew

Johnny Depp as Captain Jack Sparrow
Geoffrey Rush as Captain Barbossa
Orlando Bloom as Will Turner
Keira Knightley as Elizabeth Swann
Jack Davenport as James Norrington
Bill Nighy as Davy Jones
Stellan Skarsgård as 'Bootstrap' Turner
Tom Hollander as Lord Cutler Beckett
Naomie Harris as Tia Dalma
Chow Yun Fat as Captain Sao Feng

Directed by Gore Verbinksi

Written by Ted Elliot & Terry Rossio

Synopsis

With Lord Beckett and the East India Company in control of Davy Jones and the Flying Dutchman, the pirate lords of the world must unite or become extinct. Unfortunately, one of them died at the end of the previous film...

High Point

The fate of the Flying Dutchman and her crew, or more particularly, the point where they realise what it is.

Low Point

While trying not to spoil the outcome of the final battle, if you've got cannon balls penetrating a ship, aren't they going to come out the other side? And if so, isn't it a bad idea to have an ally also firing from the other side?

The Scores

Originality: Sequels are never as original as the stories they are sequels to of course, but this third installment adds some new elements to the existing formula, and the story's never quite entirely predictable, which leads to a few surprises. Four out of six.

Effects: Whatever else one might say about At World's End, it is extremely difficult to criticise the visual effects which are absolutely superb. The final battle in particular demonstrates a mastery of water rendering and some truly delightful explosions. Six out of six.

Story: Continuing a while after the end of the previous film, it doesn't take long before we're familiar with developments while we were away and back into the thick of things. It's a good tale with many layers of motivation, deceit, loyalty and betrayal, but at times I wonder if they didn't introduce too many new elements into this film. It works, but occasionally it does feel rather laid on by the shovelful. Highly entertaining, though. Five out of six.

Emotional Response: Because the film is produced as a pure entertainment vehicle (with a healthy dose of escapism on the side) it's difficult to become greatly emotionally invested in the characters and their fates. One never really believes that anybody important is going to die or suffer a gruesome fate for all eternity. The emotional response to this film comes more from the huge setpiece battles and events than for care over any particular character. Four out of six.

Acting: The returning cast performed much as they did in the previous film, which is to be expected. Of the new cast, I was a little disappointed in Chow Yun Fat, as I felt he was just a little too over the top. Orlando Bloom, unfortunately, remains only moderately convincing, particularly next to Johnny Depp and Geoffrey Rush, both of whom are clearly having enormous fun. Mention must also be made of the superb Bill Nighy, who once more steals the film. Five out of six.

Production: Parts of this film don't feel like a Pirates film, but by and large this only applies to the parts which take place in the lands of the dead and as such you expect things to be a little strange there. Elsewhere, the environments are lavish, the ships are romantic tributes to a bygone era of stories and songs, and the fight choreography is ridiculously complicated yet extremely effective. My most serious criticism lies in the soundtrack, as the growing prevalence of electric guitars became distracting as the story reached its climax. Five out of six.

Overall: Overall, this is a very enjoyable romp, but if you go into the cinema expecting something miraculous you will come out disappointed. Five out of six.

And so we award Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End a very respectable thirty-four out of forty-two.



 Comments

Crossfire...
posted by FarmerBob on May 25 2007, 6:45 am
About the low point...

Cannon of that era were not exactly what we would consider powerful artillery pieces. I'm not an expert on the subject (nor have I seen the movie), but cannon balls are not known for their ability to penetrate well. The cannon balls would, after striking a ship, either stay in that ship or fall into the water beyond. At best the cannon ball would bounce harmlessly off the reinforced hull of the third ship unless it struck nothing in the target ship.

reply to this

Re: Crossfire...
posted by zonk3r on May 27 2007, 12:09 pm
Actually the bigger problem with that scene was the ship they were firing into had more cannons than you would have seen on a real ship of the era. There was a very short period where ships had cannons from water line to the deck.

This design was quickly eradicate after realizing the ship became very top heavy and likely to roll in bad weather or in the unlikely event of synchronously firing all cannons on one side of the ship.

In any case, it was a fun movie that had some issues mainly in that it was rather convoluted plot-wise and could have used some trimming down. It is sad though that this is the last we'll see of Capt. Jack but the last scene is a fitting end.

BTW, stay until after the credits.

reply to this

Re: Crossfire...
posted by mbourgon on May 29 2007, 5:29 pm
It is sad though that this is the last we'll see of Capt. Jack but the last scene is a fitting end.

Nuh-uh. That had sequel written all over it. They'll be chasing him there, or something like that. Depp got top billing on 2 & 3 - I don't see them leaving him out of the next.

BTW, stay until after the credits.

DOH! Since I didn't, what was it?

reply to this

Re: Crossfire...
posted by zonk3r on May 29 2007, 9:24 pm
DOH! Since I didn't, what was it?


minor spoiler follows:

We see a bright green flash and Will Turner coming back after 10 years to see... WT III standing on shore with his mother waiting for Will. Nothing big, but a nice little touch.

reply to this

Re: Crossfire...
posted by iamlegion on May 29 2007, 8:42 am
I was re-watching the first movie a while back, and was really impressed with the amount of thought & period research they clearly tried to get in (not always successfully, but hey - it's Hollywood). The one glaring thing the missed though was the ship combat... The Big Deal in ship combat was _not_ coming side-by-side with the target - that's clearly stupid. The best thing to do was to "cross the T" - come across the direct bow (or stern) of the target and send your broadside right at them. Yes, you've got a smaller target to shoot at, but a) your target can't really bring any guns to bear to shoot back at you, and b) the shots that do hit will travel farther through the length of the target, doing more damage.

That said, FarmerBob's right in that a round, after going through _both_ side hulls of a ship, wouldn't really have enough oomph left to hurt a ship on the far side. Although they do get bonus points for using chain shot to take out the enemy's mast & rigging.

reply to this

Re: Crossfire...
posted by zonk3r on May 29 2007, 9:33 pm
Agreed.

If anyone is into this kind of thing I highly recommend the Aubrey/Maturin series of books by Patrick O'Brian (of which they made a movie "Master and Commander" out of a culmination of the first few books). Great stuff.

I also doubt there will be a true sequel to this as none of the principals have agreed to return and though Depp has said he loves the character my bet is he probably would like to return to him smaller more kitschy movies. But I hope I'm wrong (at least I hope they don't do a typical Disney crapass direct to video release).

reply to this

Re: Crossfire...
posted by Eldhrin on May 30 2007, 4:50 am
Okay so I shouldn't have expected the Pearl and the Dutchman to sink each other in that scene, but it really did look like they should judging by the effects work of cannon balls penetrating the ships.

reply to this

Re: Crossfire...
posted by roseblood on May 31 2007, 11:55 am
About the low point...

Cannon of that era were not exactly what we would consider powerful artillery pieces. I'm not an expert on the subject (nor have I seen the movie), but cannon balls are not known for their ability to penetrate well. The cannon balls would, after striking a ship, either stay in that ship or fall into the water beyond. At best the cannon ball would bounce harmlessly off the reinforced hull of the third ship unless it struck nothing in the target ship.


An 12 pound (lead) ball had no problem penetrating a 6 inch thick multi-layered bit of reinforced planking in a not so recent cable television series. It proceeded to penetrate the bodies of 3 or 4 hog carcasses (human substitutes) before flying onward. I haven't seen the film but it would seem a non-explosive ball could penetrate and exit a ship with a six inch thick hull.

reply to this

Re: Crossfire...
posted by FarmerBob on June 3 2007, 3:31 pm
About the low point...

Cannon of that era were not exactly what we would consider powerful artillery pieces. I'm not an expert on the subject (nor have I seen the movie), but cannon balls are not known for their ability to penetrate well. The cannon balls would, after striking a ship, either stay in that ship or fall into the water beyond. At best the cannon ball would bounce harmlessly off the reinforced hull of the third ship unless it struck nothing in the target ship.


An 12 pound (lead) ball had no problem penetrating a 6 inch thick multi-layered bit of reinforced planking in a not so recent cable television series. It proceeded to penetrate the bodies of 3 or 4 hog carcasses (human substitutes) before flying onward. I haven't seen the film but it would seem a non-explosive ball could penetrate and exit a ship with a six inch thick hull.



The problem here is not penetrating one wall. The problem is penetrating one reinforced wall, then a few more things, then another reinforced wall, and after that travelling a significant distance (without previously being deflected in some way) and penetrating ANOTHER reinforced wall. I doubt a modern artillery piece could do that without being deflected.

reply to this



<< Is there life on Mars? Chapter XVI  | Post a comment | Lost Season Finale Discussion >>
 
Current Headlines
Halloween Review: The Strangers (0)
Discussion: Life on Mars (8)
Secret Invasion Review - "Black Panther #39-41" (0)
Smallville Review - "Instinct" (3)
Knight Rider Discussion - 'Knight of the Iguana' (4)
Secret Invasion Review - "Deadpool #1-3" (0)
Supernatural Discussion - Season 4, Episodes 1-4 (3)
Secret Invasion Review - "Secret Invasion: Runaways / Young Avengers" (0)

Other SF Sites
Sci-Fi Storm

<i>V</i> miniseries remake on the boards at ABC
<i>Iron Man</i> sets records with DVD and Blu-Ray releases
On vacation...
<i>When We Left The Earth</i> DVD Review
<i>Red Mars</i> to become AMC series
Star Wars Fan Films airing on Comedy Central!
<i>Fringe</i> gets a full season
Video mashup: <i>Star Trek</i> meets <i>The A-Team</i>
An Alien Sings I Will Survive
Early termination for Sarah Connor?
STARTREK.COM - Headlines

Next Remastered Episode: "Tomorrow Is Yesterday"
Keep the conversation going on StarTrek.com boards
Okuda Logo for New Lunar Lander Unveiled
"InAlienable" Premieres, "Of Gods & Men" Soon!
Jerry Goldsmith: A Personal Reminiscence
TNG20: It Was Twenty Years Ago Today (December 1987)
EDITOR'S PICK: Suzie Plakson - "Good Luck Charm" CD
Etchstar Customized iPod nano Giveaway
ASK KATE: Trekkies, Trekkers, Which Is It?
POLL: Which TNG "gift" would you like this holiday season?

Other Random Cool Sites
Ars Technica

New maskless lithography trick may keep Moore's Law on track
Scared profitable: Valley VCs preach return of the Old Ones
Washington DC latest to drop Microsoft for web apps
FCC says Seattle tests back smutless, free broadband proposal
Employees, not hackers, cause most corporate data loss
This week in open source: distro betas, new Mono and Python
The week in hardware: DX 11, Nehalem, and AMD
The week in Microsoft: Windows XP, Live Search, Silverlight
The week in science: flexing solar cells, universal lumpiness, and our mysterious sun
News week in review: mail goggles, counterfeit military chips, and city-owned fiber
The week in gaming: a LittleBigPlanet calculator, night vision, and Gears 2
This week in Apple: New notebooks, new writers, and more Woz
The math gap: it's cultural (so stop mocking nerds)
Wal-Mart joins MSN and Yahoo, leaves DRM servers online
Iowa State to charge students for dorm room land lines
Think of the children! AA and Delta agree to filter porn
Quantum encryption and the weakness of European science
Holiday wars: Sony counts on games, Microsoft on price
Seagate spins plans for solid-state drives in 2009
Osama bin Fragged: a review of terrorist propaganda games
[H]ardOCP News/Article Feed

HMS Hood Reborn as 20-Ft Lego Model
Leaked MacBook Case Photos Hit the Web
[H] Gaming News
HTC G1 Presales Reported at 1.5 Million Units
[H]ardware Roundup
Worst Windows Flaws from the Past Decade
Energy Boosters Tested: What Geek Cuisine Works?
Interview with WoW Lead Producer
Lord British is in Space
Core i7-965 XE Overclocked to 4.20 GHz
OpenOffice 3.0 Final Available
Apple Offers Support for MacBooks with Failing Nvidia GPUs
Personal Data on 30 Million Germans Compromised
[H] Gaming News
NASA Moves Forward with Mars Rover Launch in 2009
MSI Eclipse X58 Sneak Peek
Foxconn A79A-S - 790FX SB750 Motherboard
AMD's ATI Radeon HD 4870 with 1GB of GDDR5
Topower PowerBird Series Power Supplies
EVGA nForce 780i SLI FTW
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky - Gameplay Perf and IQ
Intel's New Solid State Drive - Video Review
Radeon 4800 & GeForce 200 Series Value Guide
FSP Everest 700w Power Supply
BFGTech GeForce GTX 260 OCX MAXCORE
MSI Blows or Goes? The Wind Netbook Video Review
XFX GeForce 9800 GTX+
Take Control of Your 4800 Video Card's Fan
XFX GeForce GTX 280 and 260 XXX Edition
AMD ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Slashdot

National Debt Clock Overflowed, Extended By a Digit
English Court Allows Patents For "Complex" Software
Fuel Efficiency and Slow Driving?
Microsoft Quietly Previews PC Advisor Repair Tool
Baldness Gene Discovered — 1 In 7 Men "At Risk"
Court Rules That Palin Must Save Yahoo Emails
Elcomsoft Claims WPA/WPA2 Cracking Breakthrough
"Black Silicon" Advances Imaging, Solar Energy
Feds Consider H-1B Changes After Uncovering Fraud
Canadian NDP Leader Praises P2P Communities
Soyuz With Richard Garriott Successfully Launched
The Rise of the (Financial) Machines
FCC Report Supports Use of White Spaces For Wireless
3D Printing On Demand
A Robot To Destroy Breast Cancer Cells


Want our headlines on your site? You can snag our RSS file and go to town. (RDF/RSS parser sold separately.) All site content © and owned by its author - for the full skinny, read the legal disclaimers bit.