Bureau 42 | Star Trek XI Teaser Online

not logged in
new user
login
search
submit article
downloadables
about us
site stats

bureau42.com email

Check your mail, or get a free address

Problems with the site? Comments? Questions? Let us know!

Star Trek XI Teaser Online

posted January 21 2008, 2:37 pm by theangrymob

For those that didn't see it with Cloverfield this weekend, here it is:

480p
720p
1080p

Official Site

Read more... ( 17 comments already posted ) | ( 186 bytes in body ) | ( Post a comment )

<< Review: Cloverfield | Post a comment | Breaking Bad Is Story Good >>

OK, I admit, I'm starting to get excited. The ship looks awesome and you really get a feel for the sheer scale of the Enterprise. Hopefully this is a worthwhile Christmas present!

Comments

Timeline

posted by chad on January 21 2008, 3:12 pm

Where in the Star Trek timeline is this one supposed to occur?

____________________
Check out Chad's News

reply to this

Re: Timeline

posted by grundil on January 21 2008, 3:21 pm

Where in the Star Trek timeline is this one supposed to occur?

I believe it's Kirk, Spock, etc first mission, right out of the academy

reply to this

At it again with the viral marketing ...

posted by joe__gee on January 21 2008, 3:30 pm

Click on the red dot next to "under construction." I have no clue how to reveal anything else.

-Joe

reply to this

Re: At it again with the viral marketing ...

posted by joe__gee on January 21 2008, 3:34 pm

Click on the red dot next to "under construction." I have no clue how to reveal anything else.

-Joe

Adjust the sliders. Around 123 in camera 2, 955 in camera 3, 281 in camera 4. I can't find anything for camera 1.

reply to this

Re: At it again with the viral marketing ...

posted by Cunning_Linguist on January 23 2008, 3:59 am

Click on the red dot next to "under construction." I have no clue how to reveal anything else.

-Joe

Adjust the sliders. Around 123 in camera 2, 955 in camera 3, 281 in camera 4. I can't find anything for camera 1.

Camera 1: 564 (100%)
Camera 2: 125 (100%)
Camera 3: 955 (100%)
Camera 4: ? (Shows up as "Offline" for me... YMMV)

reply to this

Re: At it again with the viral marketing ...

posted by Cunning_Linguist on January 23 2008, 2:54 pm

Click on the red dot next to "under construction." I have no clue how to reveal anything else.

-Joe

Adjust the sliders. Around 123 in camera 2, 955 in camera 3, 281 in camera 4. I can't find anything for camera 1.

Camera 1: 564 (100%)
Camera 2: 125 (100%)
Camera 3: 955 (100%)
Camera 4: ? (Shows up as "Offline" for me... YMMV)

Camera 4: 289 (100%)

reply to this

Captian Pike?

posted by J_W_W on January 21 2008, 4:00 pm

So, Kirk and Spock will take the Enterprise out for its first spin eh?

Yep, I've felt all along that they were going to totally scrap the old cannon. I'm beginning to get more and more sure that
I'm right.

reply to this

Re: Captian Pike?

posted by babasyzygy on January 21 2008, 4:13 pm

Yep, I've felt all along that they were going to totally scrap the old cannon. I'm beginning to get more and more sure that
I'm right.

Mind you, changes in what we know would only mean that a something was done as part of the temporal war.

reply to this

Re: Captian Pike?

posted by J_W_W on January 22 2008, 8:04 am

Yep, I've felt all along that they were going to totally scrap the old cannon. I'm beginning to get more and more sure that
I'm right.

Mind you, changes in what we know would only mean that a something was done as part of the temporal war.

No no no no no. Please no. If you're right, this movie will suck worse than I thought.

reply to this

Re: Captian Pike?

posted by chad on January 21 2008, 5:00 pm

So, Kirk and Spock will take the Enterprise out for its first spin eh?

I can't speak for Starfleet, but the US Navy does not give away command positions to officers who are fresh out of the Naval Academy. And for the larger ships, you won't get command until you've got significant rank (e.g., Captain).

reply to this

Starfleet Academy : Animal House

posted by rickyjames on January 21 2008, 6:33 pm

Maybe they're gonna hijack the Big E as a frat prank. Spock is onboard after hours programming the computer for extra credit, forced to go along for the joyride...

reply to this

Silly nit

posted by nedwidek on January 21 2008, 4:06 pm

I didn't think that Constitution class starships could land. Isn't that why every movie has shown them being constructed in space dock?

I know, I know. Why am I expecting consistency or canon out of this frachise?

reply to this

Re: Silly nit

posted by fliptw on January 21 2008, 9:27 pm

I didn't think that Constitution class starships could land. Isn't that why every movie has shown them being constructed in space dock?

I know, I know. Why am I expecting consistency or canon out of this frachise?

well, all seafaring vessels start on land...

hell, all trek vessels could have been built planetside...

reply to this

Sci-fi fans

posted by mrmcgibby on January 21 2008, 7:46 pm

For a bunch of sci-fi fans, you folks sure don't seem to be up on the latest info about this movie.

To answer some questions:

Kirk is quite unlikely to be the first commander of the Enterprise in this movie. Captain Pike is in the cast so while that isn't a guarantee, but it certainly leads one to believe that he might be the captain. And for those who say that Captain April was the first captain. That isn't canon, at least from on-screen source material.

Now, about the construction of the ship on the ground. You really should read the interview with Robert Orci at http://trekmovie.com/2008/01/19/interview-orci-answers-questions-about-new-trek-trailer/ which is actually quite inspiring. His knowledge is better than most fans and he has no intention of messing up what is true canon.

The plaque on the Enterprise says, "San Francisco". I'm pretty sure that San Francisco is firmly attached to the planet, and isn't going to detach itself any time soon. So I don't see how any of that implies in any way that the Enterprise was built entirely in space. The only reason that everyone thinks that it was built in space is because we see the ship in space dock in many of the movies.

reply to this

Re: Sci-fi fans

posted by jesusX on January 21 2008, 11:09 pm

The plaque on the Enterprise says, "San Francisco". I'm pretty sure that San Francisco is firmly attached to the planet, and isn't going to detach itself any time soon.

Precisely. No where was it ever stated the Enterprise wasn't constructed on the ground. Further, there's nothing really preventing it from being constructed on the ground. Build it, then lift it off with anti-grav units or something. It doesn't haev to be able to land to be build on the ground. Being lifted into space is far different than being able to enter an atmosphere.

reply to this

Re: Sci-fi fans

posted by J_W_W on January 22 2008, 8:18 am

For a bunch of sci-fi fans, you folks sure don't seem to be up on the latest info about this movie.

That's true. I am actively trying not to get any hopes up for this movie and am not at all actively seeking out information.

I just have a really bad feeling that this movie will be really bad.

Nemisis and Enterprise combined to break any hope I had of the Star Trek franchise getting back in stride. And a reboot of the original series is _not_ going to change my feelings on that. This movie will have to be 100% better than I think it will be to get me back to caring about Star Trek. That said, I will watch it on DVD when it comes out, but I'm not really interested in seeing this in the theatre.

reply to this

Bad Robot!

posted by fsphil on January 21 2008, 11:57 pm

My only hope for this movie is that it will have an ending.

reply to this

<< Review: Cloverfield | Post a comment | Breaking Bad Is Story Good >>

Current Headlines

Millar and Gough now to write "Robotech" Movie (2)

Fringe Discussion: "The Equation" (2)

Weekly Comics Discussion - November 19, 2008 (0)

Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles: "Complications" (6)

Heroes Discussion: It's Coming (2)

Star Trek Trailer Now Online (6)

Comic Films (0)

LHC Rap (0)

Other SF Sites

Sci-Fi Storm

"The Genesis of Doctor Who" notes available at the BBC

Robotech feature gets new writers, rewrite

Star Trek trailers now live

The Phoenix Comicon Shows the Enterprise's Data Some Fun

World War Z gets direction from Marc Forster

One pickup, one axe, and one beer...

Image of new Enterprise

Knight Rider gets downsized, rebooted

Johnston to direct First Avenger: Captain America

John Williams/Star Wars a capella tribute

STARTREK.COM - Headlines

Next Remastered Episode: "Tomorrow Is Yesterday"

Keep the conversation going on StarTrek.com boards

Okuda Logo for New Lunar Lander Unveiled

"InAlienable" Premieres, "Of Gods & Men" Soon!

Jerry Goldsmith: A Personal Reminiscence

TNG20: It Was Twenty Years Ago Today (December 1987)

EDITOR'S PICK: Suzie Plakson - "Good Luck Charm" CD

Etchstar Customized iPod nano Giveaway

ASK KATE: Trekkies, Trekkers, Which Is It?

POLL: Which TNG "gift" would you like this holiday season?

Other Random Cool Sites

Ars Technica

Report: Want to be a green gamer? Turn off your console

McColo reconnect highlights network security gap

Resurrecting the mammoth? New research raises the prospect

Faster than the speed of dark: annihilations above Antarctica

Grow your own: tissue engineering saves patient's lung

Antipiracy group pushes 10 years jail time for UK infringers

EU launches public consultation on Internet security

FCC Commissioner calls for Portable People Meter probe

Amazon CloudFront turns S3 into content distribution network

Scientists see political attacks as badge of pride

Eulogy for a good friend: RIP, twisted pair telephone line

Google copyright deal moves forward

Co-op resurrected: Ars reviews Left 4 Dead

WiFi goes green: solar-powered outdoor nodes coming soon

Tennessee anti-P2P law to cost colleges over $13 million

US court orders keylogger CyberSpy to halt software sales

Judge slaps down Psystar's antitrust claims against Apple

HP previews strong fourth quarter

Who's top in tech policy? Our new "People to Watch" list

Kodak sues LG and Samsung over alleged patent violations

[H]ardOCP News/Article Feed

Ballmer Dismisses Yahoo Buyout But Open On Search

Koolance CPU-350 Sneak Peek

Gaming News

AMD Analyst Day November 2008

[H]ardware Round-Up

Blu-ray Burners To Go Mainstream In PCs By 2011

[H]ard|OCP [H]otDeals

Exciting Features For Ubuntu 9.04

NASA Tests "Deep Space Internet"

VIA Launches VIPRO Touch-Screen Panel PC

Mark Cuban Responds to SEC Charges

Tennessee Governor Signs Campus Downloading Bill Into Law

Microsoft Announces Plans for No-Cost Consumer Security Offering

AMD Publishes Results of Major European Survey

G4saurus Defectus

AMD Analyst Day November 2008

Fallout 3 Gameplay Performance and Image Quality

Your Mail in Rebate May Be In Jeopardy

Intel Core i7 920 Overclocking and Power

OCZ 700W ModXStream Pro Power Supply

ASUS Rampage II Extreme

Galaxy GeForce GTX 260+ Overclocked Version

Intel Core i7 920 Overclocking and Heat

ASUS P6T Deluxe

Intel Core i7 and Gaming

Intel Core i7 Application Results

Intel Core i7 Synthetic Benchmarks

EVGA 790i SLI FTW Motherboard

FarCry 2 Gameplay Performance

Gigabyte GA-EP45T-Extreme

Slashdot

FCC Publishes "White Spaces" Rules

NRDC Rates Energy Efficiency of Video Game Consoles

London's Oystercard Gets New Contract, But Same Suppliers

Wolfram Research Releases Mathematica 7

Lunar Oxygen and Water Production Tech Tested

Microsoft Feared Mac vs. Vista In '05

American Nerd

Astronaut Loses Tools While Performing an EVA

Ray Kurzweil Wonders, Can Machines Ever Have Souls?

Fewer Than 1% Arrested From TSA's "Behavior Detection"

Psystar Antitrust Claim Against Apple Dismissed

Oldest Nuclear Family Found Murdered In Germany

The Importance of Procedural Content Generation In Games

Court Slams Door On Sale of Spyware

Should You Get Paid While Your Computer Boots?

Want our headlines on your site? You can snag our RSS file and go to town. (RDF/RSS parser sold separately.) All site content © and owned by its author - for the full skinny, read the legal disclaimers bit .