bureau42.com      

bureau42.com email
Check your mail, or get a free address

Add to Google

part of the everyone.net Entertainment Network

Dreamhost Web Hosting

Problems with the site? Comments? Questions? Let us know!

 
welcome to bureau42.com
 
Firefly Review - "Serenity"
posted December 21 2002, 6:13 am by fiziko

Category: Firefly This was the original, unaired two hour pilot episode. It also sounds like it may be the last episode ever broadcast.

Read more... ( 27 comments already posted ) | ( 4301 bytes in body ) | ( Post a comment )


<< Movie Review - "The Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers"  | Post a comment | Enterprise Review: "The Catwalk" >>

Cast

Nathan Fillion as Malcolm Reynolds
Gina Torres as Zoe
Alan Tudyk as Wash
Morena Baccarin as Inara
Jewel Staite as Kaylee
Adam Baldwin as Jayne
Sean Maher as Dr. Simon Tam
Summer Glau as River Tam
Ron Glass as Book

Crew

Written and directed by Joss Whedon.
The complete IMDB listings can be found here.
The official website can be found here.

Original Airdate

Serenity originally aired on Friday, December 20, 2002.

Premise

The original two hour pilot episode, this explains how Shepherd Book, Simon Tam, and River Tam joined the crew.

High Point

"What do you pay him for?"

Low Point

The recycled jokes. I know they were in this one first, and then they were used in other episodes when there was doubt this would ever air, but the viewers have already seen them.

The Review

This would have felt incredibly original had it been aired first. It also would have done a much better job of setting up the technological diversity of this universe. Unfortunately, the decision to air this later (which I do not understand) hurt its impact when it finally arrived. I give it 4 out of 6.

The effects are a little more extravagant in some cases then we've seen until now. The shots of the ship kicking up its engines, for example, seem to be more complex than they've since become. I give it 5 out of 6.

The story was well woven together; without the opening credits, you wouldn't know which, if any, passengers would stay on board until after the conversation in the mess hall. There were at least three threads going, all of which taught the viewer a lot about the characters and their relationships. This is a good episode, and an excellent pilot. I give it 5 out of 6.

The acting seems to be more in line with the later episodes this season than the early ones. The cast seems to be more comfortable with themselves now than in some of the episodes produced just after it. I give it 5 out of 6.

The emotional response in this episode was strong. I laughed at the jokes, and I actually would have cared about some of these characters at the end of this pilot than I did at the end of the pilot we had. This does a much better job of setting up what odds they'll be facing and why they're together than The Train Job did. Most of that is probably due to the two hour length, that provides them with the time they needed to get these things right without rushing them. I give it 5 out of 6.

The production was what we've come to expect from Mutant Enemy and Joss Whedon. The interestingly out of sync vidual and audio cuts while Inara was at work also did an excellent job of setting up her duplicity between her feelings and her on the job behaviour. I give it 6 out of 6.

Overall, this should have been the pilot that was broadcast. It's paced in line with most of the rest of the series, it introduces the characters well, starting from how they actually came together, and finishing with why they relate to each other the way they do. Still, it never gets so mired with introductions that it stops being interesting in its own right. I give it 5 out of 6.

In total, Serenity receives 35 out of 42.



 Comments

Last episode?
posted by quecojones on December 21 2002, 8:16 am
You mention that this might be the last episode ever broadcast. Why is that exactly? Has the show been canceled?

reply to this

Re: Last episode?
posted by tero on December 21 2002, 9:05 am
You mention that this might be the last episode ever broadcast. Why is that exactly? Has the show been canceled?
In short, yes, Firefly has been cancelled.. Check this story.

reply to this

Re: Last episode?
posted by quecojones on December 21 2002, 10:14 am
You mention that this might be the last episode ever broadcast. Why is that exactly? Has the show been canceled?
In short, yes, Firefly has been cancelled.. Check this story.
Excuse my french, but that sucks festering monkey butt! :(

Thanks for the link though.

reply to this

Have to disagree
posted by Nightwanderer on December 21 2002, 9:33 am
This episode felt like the pilot it was. I liked it mind you, but the train robbery episode pulled me in far faster than this one would have. I much prefer a show to be "happening" and in motion when I join it over being introduced to everyone like a debutante.

The action of the program should give me back story, or at least enough to let me know why the action is going where it is going. To me, it is no diffent than in real life, when you walk into a small shop and first meet the people that work there. You don't know who is married to whom, who slept with whom, or who is stealing what. If you get to know the people over time, you will find out, but not on day one. All you know then is the result.

OK, but other than that, I liked it. Fiannly something aabout Book that I liked. A Baptist monk! I was expectinig something else. We see more about how Jayn, Zoe and some others joined the crew in another episode, but I definitely liked what we learned in this one.

Too bad is it was cancelled. I defintely would buy the DVD if they ever get it together.

Bill

ps. I think Zoe's husband was destined to buy it by season's end. She has too much chemistry with Mal. By Season 3, they would be an item.


reply to this

Re: Have to disagree
posted by fiziko on December 21 2002, 9:43 am

ps. I think Zoe's husband was destined to buy it by season's end. She has too much chemistry with Mal. By Season 3, they would be an item.

I think it would be Mal and Inara, if anyone. (Simon and Kaylee was actually happening.) I agree about the tension, but I'd think Zoe would die in the line of duty, and then Mal and Wash would need to live with that.


reply to this

Re: Have to disagree
posted by Babbster on December 21 2002, 2:35 pm
You make some good points but the sad fact is that most people want shows spoon-fed to them, especially at the outset. This show in particular suffered from the fact that not only was it attempting to establish a new cast of characters that people have no experience with, but a new science fiction universe as well. BTVS, for example, had a setting that everyone is familiar with and so didn't have to do any extra work in trying to flesh it out.

I think this pilot, properly promoted, could have generated the ratings, both short- and long-term, that Fox supposedly wanted. If the more casual viewers could have gotten more back story early, it would have allowed them to better enjoy the following episodes. Heck, it would have probably allowed ME to better enjoy a couple episodes (particularly the out-of-order weeks) better than I did.


reply to this

Too Good For Network Television
posted by TechnoGirl on December 21 2002, 10:37 am
When firefly first came out I had *many* concerns about the concept and the characters. Had I seen *this* episode I would have been an instant fan. This is a FANTASTIC series. The writig, the characters - the **camera work** simnply excel!

IMHO you missed on of he high points. I loved the shot of the Captain zipping back up in the bathroom. How many scifi shows have shown people taking a normal pee in the past??? I think this was a tongue-in-cheek way of Wheedon saying that this is not your normal scifi show - these characters are ment to be real people.

Another high point for me was the normally all to hackneyed scene where the villian holds a gun to the girls head in full view of everybody - not taking cover and demands that everyone do as he says. Mal walks on board and, without saying a word or breaking his stride just blows the bad guy away and tosses him off the ship. Another tongue-in-cheek commentary on trite and overplayed scenes.

In short the series is just TOO DAMN GOOD for the likes of network television where shows like Golden Girls are more the audience's speed. I hope Showtime picks it up because the series a potential gold mine IMHO. I'd wish the same for the SCIFI channel but they seem to busy buying shows about psychics who talk to the dead and idiots who interpret your dreams for you.

Great Show!

reply to this

Re: Too Good For Network Television
posted by TechnoGirl on December 21 2002, 10:49 am
Opps! Missed ANOTHER high point - remember when Mal lied to the doctor that his patient had died...the doctor has a cow running back to the infirmary and in the next scene Mal is cracking up with the rest of the crew saying, "I'm a baaad man"....great twist on ANOTHER overplayed scene.

I wish I could see more of this great show - I can't BELEIVE the state of TV is so crappy that it's just going to be dropped and NO ONE will pick it back up .....ohhhh...yah...I can believe it I suppose :(

reply to this

Re: Too Good For Network Television
posted by rickyjames on December 21 2002, 7:55 pm
TG, I remember your initial reluctance to accept this series and become emotionally involved and I take your conversion to be an example of just what this show COULD achieve by slowly building viewership if it were just given a chance. THere's three more eps in the can that Fox may never air. Joss is supposed to be trying to sell Firefly to UPN as a midseason replacement, the odds are estimated at 50-50. Even in its current anemic state Firefly is higher rated than all but 2 UPN shows (Enterprise and -gag - WWF wrestling!) and it's ready to go in terms of set and cast availability. Firefly may yet fly again - but I agree, it's too good for the drek known as network TV.

reply to this

Re: Too Good For Network Television
posted by Daemonik on December 22 2002, 5:48 am
Even in its current anemic state Firefly is higher rated than all but 2 UPN shows (Enterprise and -gag - WWF wrestling!)
When I first heard that Joss was shopping Firefly to UPN I had some reservations about it. I mean UPN is the home of Star Trek, and they have quite a bit of their company tied up in that franchise.

Even on its worst day, Firefly makes Enterpise look sick and pathetically formulaeic. One would wonder if UPN really wants that kind of competition around when it could potentially draw viewers away from their golden cash cow.


reply to this

Re: Too Good For Network Television
posted by rickyjames on December 22 2002, 1:05 pm
One would wonder if UPN really wants that kind of competition around when it could potentially draw viewers away from their golden cash cow.
UPN better get with a reality check and realize that not only does Enterprise suck but so did Nemesis second-week boxoffice, and the'd better scoop up the next major franchise from Joss while they can, or they're gonna be left with nothing. I'm about ready to put Star Trek on the shelf with The Three Stooges as a historical franchise, not a viable current one.

reply to this

Re: Too Good For Network Television
posted by TechnoGirl on December 22 2002, 4:27 pm
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE="cite">
I'm about ready to put Star Trek on the shelf with The Three Stooges as a historical franchise, not a viable current one.
</BLOCKQUOTE>

"Franchise"

You can have good writing and good television ....or you can have a "franchise". But not both.

It's sort of like choosing to have an Italian dinner at your local family owned Italian restaurant...or at the Olive Garden.

Don't let Corpspeak infiltrate our daily lives pulleze...run that idea up your flagpole and let me know what 'ya think OK?


reply to this

Re: Too Good For Network Television
posted by rickyjames on December 24 2002, 6:21 am
Well, I certainly agree that the dictates of a TV "franchise" just about make it impossible to have good TV. The "franchise" must meet the "demographics", which is another way of saying "designed by a committee". You know, last season I tried to get into Alias and 24, both of which were hyped as fresh and original and bold and innovative. I found both pretty stale as they suffer from Gilligan's Disease - there ain't gonna be no resolution this week. Which is what doomed Voyager and also why I don't understand why John Doe is doing so much better than Firefly. That's no reason there can't be character development in such an environment, but even THAT is elusive. Firefly somehow had/(has) the potential that you really didn't know where it was going but it was going SOMEWHERE. In that sense it's not a franchise, which knows EXACTLY where it wants to go...and squeezes the innovation and sponaneous life out of its creations in the process.

reply to this

Re: Too Good For Network Television
posted by y42 on December 22 2002, 2:31 pm
Joss is supposed to be trying to sell Firefly to UPN as a midseason replacement, the odds are estimated at 50-50. Even in its current anemic state Firefly is higher rated than all but 2 UPN shows (Enterprise and -gag - WWF wrestling!) and it's ready to go in terms of set and cast availability. Firefly may yet fly again - but I agree, it's too good for the drek known as network TV.
That's WWE now...

Man I gots to get me a printer and some of that thick cardboard-like paper to let the UPN people know I wants me Firefly...


reply to this

fox
posted by y42 on December 21 2002, 2:23 pm
Unfortunately, the decision to air this later (which I do not understand)
I now have a theory that the people of fox are EVIL! PURE AND SIMPLE!

I think they are purposfully buying and cancelling good shows out of pure malice, and not out of half-assed buisness decisions as I once thought...anybody care to check if they have inversed pentagrams in their lobby or something?


reply to this

Re: fox
posted by Alexius on December 24 2002, 4:09 am
anybody care to check if they have inversed pentagrams in their lobby or something?
Nit Pick, On Two Counts.

1.) A Pentagram Is A Five Pointed Star In A Circle, Tip Pointing Down. It Has Little To Do With Paganism In General. The Star In A Circle, With Point Up Is A Pentacle. (I'm Pagan, And A Generally Good Person. I Work With A Charity Organization That Does Numerous Charity Activies In An Attempt To Dispell The Bad Names That Pagan Have Gotten From Television. Paganism Are No Better Or Worse Than Any Other Religion.)

*Steps Off Soap Box, Mutting "How'd I Get Up There?"*

2.) We Actually Did A Ritual (Read: Said A Prayer) To Keep Firefly On The Air (At The Request Of My High Priestesses Husband.) Per My Suggestion, We Used A Whedon Ritual. Draw A Circle On The Ground. Leap Into The Circle. Leap Out Of The Circle, Then Shake Your Gourd. (We Substitued A Rainstick For Gourd. -- Bonus Points If Anyone Recognizes The Spell.)


reply to this

Re: fox
posted by y42 on December 24 2002, 10:45 am
anybody care to check if they have inversed pentagrams in their lobby or something?
Nit Pick, On Two Counts.

1.) A Pentagram Is A Five Pointed Star In A Circle, Tip Pointing Down. It Has Little To Do With Paganism In General. The Star In A Circle, With Point Up Is A Pentacle. (I'm Pagan, And A Generally Good Person. I Work With A Charity Organization That Does Numerous Charity Activies In An Attempt To Dispell The Bad Names That Pagan Have Gotten From Television. [...])

Don't mean no disrespect to you, all the disrespect was aimed at fox (wich being a TV studio is therefore a source of the "bad name" you get).
When I say I'm sure if they decided to sell out to satan in order to increase shareholder value, they would go for the inversed pentagram in the lobby. I'm clearly not aiming for realism. : )

reply to this

Re: fox
posted by TechnoGirl on December 25 2002, 1:40 am
I Work With A Charity Organization That Does Numerous Charity Activies In An Attempt To Dispell The Bad Names That Pagan Have Gotten From Television. Paganism Are No Better Or Worse Than Any Other Religion.)


maybE ...buT theY stilL can'T capitalizE wortH a damN .

reply to this

Re: fox
posted by rusty0101 on December 26 2002, 6:40 pm
Unfortunately, the decision to air this later (which I do not understand)
I now have a theory that the people of fox are EVIL! PURE AND SIMPLE!

Never ascribe to mallace and evil that which can as easily be ascribed to the owners and executives at Fox just being plain stupid. You may not be wrong, but it is harder to prove. -Rusty

reply to this

Hmm
posted by frunk on December 21 2002, 5:07 pm
All I can say is, Fox must have had it in for Firefly after seeing the pilot. There was no reason to promote it the way they did, or stick it on Friday night, or not show a pilot that obviously did a better job of setting up the show than "The Train Job". Maybe they were expecting something different? They must have watched Joss Whedon's other shows though, right?

reply to this

Re: Hmm
posted by davatar2 on December 22 2002, 12:47 am
Joss gets ratings. We all know what fox THINKS gets ratings. So some fat cat exec decides a Joss show might be a good investment. They get the pilot and go 'WTF is this?!?' The 'train job' at least had lots of loud noises, quick action, and gruesome death - something the dullards can understand. Money is the root of all evil.

reply to this

Best Pilot Ever
posted by Jethro on December 22 2002, 5:16 pm
Before we watched this, I warned my wife that since it's the pilot, and took place before everything we've seen so far, it might suck because some character development never happend, plus I thought that since they didn't air it maybe the series changed direction or something.

But wow, it was good. I don't remember when I've seen a pilot that was this good anytime recently.

Ok, that's it. Screw Fox. I'm going to get a G4 iMac and a dv camera and shoot more episodes of Firefly myself! Since I probably can't afford the original cast, I'll be Jayne, because (A) I've always wanted to be called "Jane", and this is close enoug, (B) I don't want to shave my beard off, and (C) It's my idea.

Anyone else want in? Preferably someone who, like, knows how to make TV shows?

reply to this

Alan Dean Foster
posted by Nightwanderer on December 24 2002, 7:37 pm
In the latest Science Fiction Chronicle, AD Foster trashes Firefly. He saw and reviewed the Train Robbery, and concludes that Joss Whedon is just in it for the money. Hated the story, hated the execution, thinks the series will stink.

Obviously, publication lead times and other factors have made the review badly out of date, but the perception that Firefly should be buried, coming from a semi-respected SF writer, is hard to ignore. Admittedly, the Train Robbery was lots of flash and not much deep characterization, but he savages everything about it, the plot, the physics (Serenity over the train and no one notices), and the settings (Old West style sets).

I liked the episode, though I agree it could have been better. But what are we to do with the two contending SF crowds, one that wants Space Opera and damn the Plot Holes, and one that wants hard science with no mistakes (and no sound in Space dammit!)

SF Chronicle is a trade magazine, in that is spends a lot of time on who cut a deal with who for how much. Agents, publishers, options, lawsuits, etc. The other half is reviews and new releases, mostly books.

It isn't like the review per se really matters at this point, but the point of view disturbs me.

Bill


reply to this

Re: Alan Dean Foster
posted by TechnoGirl on December 25 2002, 10:37 am

It isn't like the review per se really matters at this point, but the point of view disturbs me.


I can relate to Foster's POV because I felt exactly the same way after seeing the train robbery episode myself. It was only after seeing several other episodes that I began to get a real feel for the series and become a fan of it. FOX made a horrid mistake by airing the train robbery episode first and the pilot last. What was up with that?? !

I'm totally convinced that the FOX execs along with 3/4's of Hollywood are on crack. Network television SUCKS...and cable (scifi channel) is hardly better.

What can we do? Read more books...although now that then 3 companies own 90% of all publishing houses scifi there is taking a nose dive as well.....maybe it's time we opened up our *own* magazines and publishing outlets via the internet??


reply to this

Re: Alan Dean Foster
posted by nyospe on December 25 2002, 7:49 pm

I'm totally convinced that the FOX execs along with 3/4's of Hollywood are on crack. Network television SUCKS...and cable (scifi channel) is hardly better.

What can we do? Read more books...although now that then 3 companies own 90% of all publishing houses scifi there is taking a nose dive as well.....maybe it's time we opened up our *own* magazines and publishing outlets via the internet??


First off: Foster is an extremely inconsistant writer. In all the pieces of literary analysis I've seen from him, he seems to go after the flaws that are most similar to his own, in the worst of his stuff. No surprise, that, but it does shed some light on the emphasis of his review.
Now... for printed sf, we have:

Baen (Simon & Schuster): While pointedly oriented toward material without complex psychological undertones, Baen continues to put out solid, rich mainstream sf, rather strongly stimulated by Jim Baen's desire to play experimental chef with his authors' styles, mixing and blending writers at will...

Tor (Tom Doherty Associates): With less of a "feel", Tor collects a number of the more literary writers of sf (as well as some mainstream hacks with inexplicable popularity... *cough*) under a loose confederation. On the major plus side: Tor (and, counting Sheffield and Forward books, occasionally Baen) also introduces the sf community to nonfiction of relevance to their tastes. On the major minus, Tor is a primary perpetrator of the franchise bastardization of once-great literary series. This is, after all, the publisher that keeps Kevin J. Anderson employed. ((shudder))

Ace (Penguin Putnam): I think this is the oldest one still around, isn't it? Certainly, they've been slowing to a trickle lately. Some reprints, some continued series, but I'll confess, no new blood, no real talent except what's been there for years...

Del Rey (Random House): Very similar state to Tor. A mix of great writers and formulaic schlock. Again, hands off approach... this is Foster's main publisher. It shows. While it isn't what it was when Lester Del Rey was managing it in detail, it is a good source of high quality sf.

Voyager Books (Harper Collins): Formerly Harper Prism. Almost all good. A range from mainstream to really creative. Heavier on fantasy than sf, but these are the people who publish Baxter.

Aspect (Warner Books): These guys are the other publisher that Foster deals with. They've printed a lot of his least well written stuff, which might cause me to suspect that the editor is to blame, but... they also publish a lot of other stuff, and some authors (Kevin J. Anderson) only come out readable under their influence.

There are several others. What's the point of this? Well, on TV, sf is represented (such as it is) by Fox, WB, and UPN, and (in theory) by SciFi. By contrast, print sf looks pretty good.

Count your blessings.

reply to this

Re: Publishing Houses
posted by TechnoGirl on December 27 2002, 11:28 pm
Penguin-Putnam - owned by Bertelsmann
Random House - owned by Bertelsmann

Voyager Books - owned by Rupert Murdoch News Corp
FoX - owned by Rupert Murdoch News Corp

Simon & schuster - owned by Viacom
UPN - owned by Viacom

Warner Books - owned by Time Warner
WB - owned by Time Warner

SCIFI channel - owned by Vivendi Universale

9 major media outlets mentioned - 5 corporate owners
FYI

reply to this

For The Record...Firefly Ratings Data
posted by rickyjames on December 26 2002, 6:55 am
September 20 Train Job* 4.0/couldn't find viewer numbers September 27 Bushwacked 3.6/ 5.5 million viewers October 4 Our Mrs. Reynolds 3.3/ 4.9 million viewers October 18 Jaynestown 2.7/ 4.3 million viewers October 25 Out of Gas 2.9/ 4.4 million viewers November 1 Shindig 2.8/ 4.3 million viewers November 8 Safe 2.9/ 4.7 million viewers November 15 Ariel 2.9/ 4.5 million viewers December 6 War Stories 2.4/ 3.9 million viewers December 13 Objects in Space 2.6/ 4.1 million viewers December 20 Serenity 2.7/ (estimate 4.3 million viewers) * Doesn't count in neilson's because aired before season started

reply to this



<< Movie Review - "The Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers"  | Post a comment | Enterprise Review: "The Catwalk" >>
 
Current Headlines
Halloween Review: The Strangers (0)
Discussion: Life on Mars (8)
Secret Invasion Review - "Black Panther #39-41" (0)
Smallville Review - "Instinct" (3)
Knight Rider Discussion - 'Knight of the Iguana' (4)
Secret Invasion Review - "Deadpool #1-3" (0)
Supernatural Discussion - Season 4, Episodes 1-4 (3)
Secret Invasion Review - "Secret Invasion: Runaways / Young Avengers" (0)

Other SF Sites
Sci-Fi Storm

<i>V</i> miniseries remake on the boards at ABC
<i>Iron Man</i> sets records with DVD and Blu-Ray releases
On vacation...
<i>When We Left The Earth</i> DVD Review
<i>Red Mars</i> to become AMC series
Star Wars Fan Films airing on Comedy Central!
<i>Fringe</i> gets a full season
Video mashup: <i>Star Trek</i> meets <i>The A-Team</i>
An Alien Sings I Will Survive
Early termination for Sarah Connor?
STARTREK.COM - Headlines

Next Remastered Episode: "Tomorrow Is Yesterday"
Keep the conversation going on StarTrek.com boards
Okuda Logo for New Lunar Lander Unveiled
"InAlienable" Premieres, "Of Gods & Men" Soon!
Jerry Goldsmith: A Personal Reminiscence
TNG20: It Was Twenty Years Ago Today (December 1987)
EDITOR'S PICK: Suzie Plakson - "Good Luck Charm" CD
Etchstar Customized iPod nano Giveaway
ASK KATE: Trekkies, Trekkers, Which Is It?
POLL: Which TNG "gift" would you like this holiday season?

Other Random Cool Sites
Ars Technica

New maskless lithography trick may keep Moore's Law on track
Scared profitable: Valley VCs preach return of the Old Ones
Washington DC latest to drop Microsoft for web apps
FCC says Seattle tests back smutless, free broadband proposal
Employees, not hackers, cause most corporate data loss
This week in open source: distro betas, new Mono and Python
The week in hardware: DX 11, Nehalem, and AMD
The week in Microsoft: Windows XP, Live Search, Silverlight
The week in science: flexing solar cells, universal lumpiness, and our mysterious sun
News week in review: mail goggles, counterfeit military chips, and city-owned fiber
The week in gaming: a LittleBigPlanet calculator, night vision, and Gears 2
This week in Apple: New notebooks, new writers, and more Woz
The math gap: it's cultural (so stop mocking nerds)
Wal-Mart joins MSN and Yahoo, leaves DRM servers online
Iowa State to charge students for dorm room land lines
Think of the children! AA and Delta agree to filter porn
Quantum encryption and the weakness of European science
Holiday wars: Sony counts on games, Microsoft on price
Seagate spins plans for solid-state drives in 2009
Osama bin Fragged: a review of terrorist propaganda games
[H]ardOCP News/Article Feed

HMS Hood Reborn as 20-Ft Lego Model
Leaked MacBook Case Photos Hit the Web
[H] Gaming News
HTC G1 Presales Reported at 1.5 Million Units
[H]ardware Roundup
Worst Windows Flaws from the Past Decade
Energy Boosters Tested: What Geek Cuisine Works?
Interview with WoW Lead Producer
Lord British is in Space
Core i7-965 XE Overclocked to 4.20 GHz
OpenOffice 3.0 Final Available
Apple Offers Support for MacBooks with Failing Nvidia GPUs
Personal Data on 30 Million Germans Compromised
[H] Gaming News
NASA Moves Forward with Mars Rover Launch in 2009
MSI Eclipse X58 Sneak Peek
Foxconn A79A-S - 790FX SB750 Motherboard
AMD's ATI Radeon HD 4870 with 1GB of GDDR5
Topower PowerBird Series Power Supplies
EVGA nForce 780i SLI FTW
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky - Gameplay Perf and IQ
Intel's New Solid State Drive - Video Review
Radeon 4800 & GeForce 200 Series Value Guide
FSP Everest 700w Power Supply
BFGTech GeForce GTX 260 OCX MAXCORE
MSI Blows or Goes? The Wind Netbook Video Review
XFX GeForce 9800 GTX+
Take Control of Your 4800 Video Card's Fan
XFX GeForce GTX 280 and 260 XXX Edition
AMD ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Slashdot

National Debt Clock Overflowed, Extended By a Digit
English Court Allows Patents For "Complex" Software
Fuel Efficiency and Slow Driving?
Microsoft Quietly Previews PC Advisor Repair Tool
Baldness Gene Discovered — 1 In 7 Men "At Risk"
Court Rules That Palin Must Save Yahoo Emails
Elcomsoft Claims WPA/WPA2 Cracking Breakthrough
"Black Silicon" Advances Imaging, Solar Energy
Feds Consider H-1B Changes After Uncovering Fraud
Canadian NDP Leader Praises P2P Communities
Soyuz With Richard Garriott Successfully Launched
The Rise of the (Financial) Machines
FCC Report Supports Use of White Spaces For Wireless
3D Printing On Demand
A Robot To Destroy Breast Cancer Cells


Want our headlines on your site? You can snag our RSS file and go to town. (RDF/RSS parser sold separately.) All site content © and owned by its author - for the full skinny, read the legal disclaimers bit.